Sepplecocks

``it's fast bcuz it dont has a gc gc are sloooooow''
Do you still think that? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C++0x#Allow_garbage_collected_implementations
Is C++ now considered slow?

>>35
Then drop pointers, so that sizeof can live happy, and use references. sizeof(t&) returns sizeof(t), meaning that they have none of the _theorical problems pointers have, since their size is not specified.
sizeof alone is not the cause, sizeof with pointers is. They are ^_theorically better than pointers.

>>34
The fact that you don't use them doesn't mean they don't exist.