/prog/ - The state of /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:03

I was an active poster here in the pre-SICP period an in the early days of SICP. I just remembered that /prog/ might still exist and came to visit. The situation is worse than I imagined.

*

"GRUNNUR"

;

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:06

hellow world

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:06

/prog/ has always been shit, don't kid yourself

and meta threads such as this don't help

Name: VIPPER 2011-02-25 12:08

the pre-SICP period
Oh god! What is this world coming to?

Anyways its not that bad, we are not reddit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:11

>>3
I know, I used to complain about them back then. It's probably just a generational thing.

I think bumbing ancient good threads was one of the best inventions ever, but very few people agreed.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:36

>>4
Indeed.

http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/fsmds/im_new_to_reddit_so_maybe_this_has_been_discussed/

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:44

very few people agreed.
i'm one of those people, necrobumping goldies just causes them to get vandalised.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:01

>>5
memoria praeteritorum bonorum

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:07

pre-SICP
GRUNNUR

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:12

New board rule: Metathreads are punishable by death and/or a job using Sepples.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:20

>>9
Your problem being?

Name: noko 2011-02-25 13:24

>>11
it's simple: noko every day

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 15:40

>>7
necrobumping goldies just causes them to get vandalised.
That's why I stopped bumping them too.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 17:20

>>11
That Grunnur came after SICP (and not in the early days)

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 19:35

GRUNNUR CAME AFTER MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 22:42

>>15
GRUNNUR CAME INTO MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:04

>>16
GRUNNUR CAME INSIDE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 18:42

>>14
Yes, "GRUNNUR" arrived¹ around a year and half later than the seminal SICP post². I still consider 2008 early in terms of SICP's presence in /prog/.

¹ http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1159065892/25
² http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1174926405/35

Fun fact: both of those posts were by me, although I didn't have anything to do with the popularization of those `memes'.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 18:54

Then why is your post full of last year's tuna?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 19:52

Grunner I came here in with a sincere tone and tried to have reasonable discourse. It didnt work and i'm convinced all of 4chan is the asshole of the internet. any effort is better served at another chan site. sorry you had to see it like this.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 20:51

>>1
The situation is worse than I imagined.
If /prog/'s state was immutable, it wouldn't become worse. Mutable state considered harmful.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 20:51

^{^{:GJS1M 67dcbdbce4a0b67c4b48e86a6ae29205a95e4b83024a9d947213d1231800e8d9

:65 e1f4c1849ad758ac3afb1fa1ed2ffb7d

:1298653391 1298857879}}
>>7
<-- that's cool and all, but check 'em

The state of /prog/

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:03

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:06

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:06

4 Name: VIPPER 2011-02-25 12:08

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:11

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:36

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:44

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:01

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:07

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:12

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:20

12 Name: noko 2011-02-25 13:24

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 15:40

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 17:20

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 19:35

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 22:42

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:04

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 18:42

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 18:54

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 19:52

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 20:51

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 20:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:06

Name: VIPPER 2011-02-25 12:08

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:11

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 12:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:07

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 13:20

Name: noko 2011-02-25 13:24

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 15:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 17:20

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 19:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 22:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 0:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 18:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 18:54

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 19:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 20:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 20:51