Exceptions?

As far as I am aware there are no threads which have no replies, therefore the NO EXCEPTIONS rule does not yet apply, as there are no EXCEPTIONS which prove the rule.

HAX MY EXCEPTIONS

>>1
There were some, the opiates one.

oh is that what is meant by NO EXCEPTIONS?

i thought it meant to always sage

>>1
Not all rules have exceptions. And that is the exception that refutes your hipothesis.

hipothesis
faggot

FOGGOT

[size=15]LOLDONGS[/size]

>>4,8
EXPERT IMAGEBOARD ``FAGGOTS''

sqlite> select thread, count(*) from posts group by thread having count(*) = 1;
sqlite>

By the way, the stupid "Tripcode testing thread"[1] managed once again to break poor shiitchan and, as a side effect, progscrape.

Someone tell me how can a thread get more than 10000 replies without using the long-fixed newline exploit. The thread is browseable page by page [2], and from post 1000 onwards [3] is a ping-pong game between stupid posts and "Over 1000 thread" replies.

[1] http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1188467121/
[2] http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1188467121/1-40 and so on.
[3] http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1188467121/1000-1040 etc.

>>11
By the way, the stupid "Tripcode testing thread"[1] managed once again to break poor shiitchan and, as a side effect, progscrape.
It's just the most replied thread on /prog/, my scraper (not written in FIOC    ) handles it correctly. There were more threads like that.

Someone tell me how can a thread get more than 10000 replies without using the long-fixed newline exploit
Nobody knows, one day, you could just reply and it wouldn't threadstop for some obscure reason.

These threads broke /prog/scrape:

'(("<a href=\"mailto:sage\"> </a>" "" "1277494135" "" " " "81.43.183.81" "" "" "1277476613" "1000" "" "1277500282")
  ("Anonymous" "" "1220909598" "<a href=\"read/prog/1220718054/17\">&gt;&gt;17</a><br/>Don't ask me, aniki." " " "131.116.254.199" "" "" "1220718054" "8" "" "1277503864"))

>>12
These two threads no longer break /prog/scrape, although they did in the past.

>>13
I just put them in a separate list if (string->number (cadddr thread)) fails.