In Lisp

The question: why ``In Lisp" guy doesn't want to post the source code of his DSL?

1. It actually doesn't exist
2. The code is so ugly he's ashamed to post

Choose wisely.

You cant tell by the magical pattern matching for lists in his DSL that it doesn't exist^[1].


References                  
   1. http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1297290971/30

>>1
What DSL are you speaking of Dear Sir?
Could you provide me with a link to the thread?
Much abliged.

>>5
>>4

Well, he did post some source code, which was quite the mess as a lotof reader macros were used, but it was still readable CL, so I'd opt for 2, except that some of the pseudocode he posted was pretty strange, meaning 1 wouldn't surprise me either.
Other options that I can see: 3. trolling, trying to make it seem like Lispers wouldn't post the code they write (I always do if I'm discussing my code with someone else; if it's something I wrote for myself or not for public consunption, I just don't talk or publish it) 4. He wants to use it in some commercial software he wrote or doesn't want to reveal his identity (unlikely for a variety of reasons)

What does DSL stand for?

>>8
Domain Specific Language

>>7
Well, he did post some source code, which was quite the mess as a lotof reader macros were used, but it was still readable CL
Do you have a link to the thread? I don't remember seeing it.

>>1-13
too lisp; didn't read

Where are all the posts? It's like nuclear holocaust happened to this thread.

>>16
i think a moderator deleted all the shitposts (there were some spam posts clogging up the threads with requests to attack some dude).

makes me want to restart my /prog/ scraper so i can keep track of what he deletes...

>>14
I think Lisp is too Lispy for you

>>18
I think noko is too noko for you

>>19
s/noko/sage/g

>>20
noko/noko/noko/noko

_‷^⁁_{‴ ‷}^⁁_{‴ ‷}^⁁_{‴ ‷}^⁁_{‴ ‷}^⁁_{‴ ‷}^⁁_{‴ ‷}^⁁_{‴ ‷}^⁁_{‴ ‷}^⁁_‴

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.