/prog/ - DECLAIM JUST KICKED IN YO!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 8:48

http://lbolla.wordpress.com/2010/12/05/sbcl-quicker-than-c/
　　　　　　　　　　　　／￣∧＿∧￣￣￣ //￣＼＼
    　　　　　　＿＿ ⊂／＿＿（´∀｀　）_＿　　/_⊃＿__|　|＼フヽ　　DECLAIM JUST KICKED
    　　　,　 ´＿　　／　　　／￣￣＿_　／￣　ヽ　　　 __ヽ￣￣　|　　IN, YO!
    　　/∠__／―/-。―／――∠＿／＿_∧　　| 　　　　 | ∧＿.|　
    　　,========――´=========＝===/⌒ヽ=|.===＝＝| | ヽ￣〕　
    　 |　＿　　 |SBCL| 　　＿　″ 　|⌒|　|/　　　_＿ /|　）ノ　　　　vroom
    　）_旧＿∈≡≡≡≡∋＿旧＿″＿||　ノ丿＿ -――┘ 丿　　　　　   　vroom!
    　　＼　＼＿ノ￣￣￣三三三＼　＼＿ノ　　　　三三三三　
    　　　　三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三
    　　　　　　　三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三
    　　　　　　　　　　三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三
    　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三三
    　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　三三三三三三三三三三三

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 8:53

Vroomvroom-san floats in river

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 10:37

The benchmark is bullshit. The C version uses OMP for threading which is notoriously slow and bloated in the GCC implementation of it.

I could rewrite it using Posix threads and a sprinkling of atomic operations for wait-free/lock-free execution, maybe a few more cache-friendly optimizations and I guarantee you it would be faster than SBCL.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 10:49

>>3
Posix threads are not portable.

TOO BAD C IS PLATFORM DEPENDENT AS FUCK

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 10:59

>>4
Implying there are noteworthy platforms besides POSIX.

As if BeOS is not dead.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 11:05

>>5
Well, I don't know how to say this but, you know, Windows is much more used than all the currently POSIX-compliant OSes out there combined.

If you want to go ````real world'''', do it properly.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 11:20

add some * restrict and watch your code fly right by you!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 11:31

AUTISM

+

TSK

==

AUTSK

Name: wall of text 2011-02-08 11:39

>>6
That's how everyone knows(like if we cared) that you are amateur and not ENTERPRISE PROGRAMMING EXPERT. When you want THE ENTERPRISE QUALITY, you want normal OSes and not that flashy secretary-with-boobs-friendly collection of games like "MShearts", "miner" aka WINDOW$.

Of course, if you are casual programmer, then programming for win is ok for you.

Remember, kid, if your OS has no ed after installation, then your OS is a joke or trolls you hard.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 11:41

>>6
implying anyone here codes for, or would in their right mind consider coding for, broken ass shitty Winblozes

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 11:50

>>10
implying anyone here > implies.
Also, Windows is the real ``real world'', UNIX is a toy OS. So, let's go back to Scheme and Lisp and shut up.

>>9
How can you deliver a robust, secure, scalable, turnkey, XML-enabled, synergetic, interoperable, ENTEPRISE-grade, high-quality, low-cost, Java-interoperable, COM-aware solution without Windows?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 12:33

>>11

Funny thing is that I see less and less of Windows (especially with Myspace dying) in the datacenter. And there ain't nuffin more Real World(tm) than big server iron.
Ergo you're wrong, bitch.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 12:44

u jus mad cuz Windows stylin on u

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 12:55

>>13
u plenty funny, haole.

Name: /g/ 2011-02-08 12:56

lol linux

>enjoy your no games

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 12:59

mailto: noko
( ≖‿≖)

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 22:26

>>11
COM-aware
IHBT

DECLAIM JUST KICKED IN YO!

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 8:48

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 8:53

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 10:37

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 10:49

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 10:59

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 11:05

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 11:20

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 11:31

9 Name: wall of text 2011-02-08 11:39

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 11:41

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 11:50

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 12:33

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 12:44

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 12:55

15 Name: /g/ 2011-02-08 12:56

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 12:59

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-08 22:26