/prog/ - Hey /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:14

Do you like my list comparison function?



#define NEXT(x) (p = (p)->next)

int compare (struct int_list *p, struct int_list *q) {

     for(; p && q; NEXT(p), NEXT(q));

     

     return p ? q ? p->value < q->value ? -1 : q->value < p->value ? 1 : 0 : 1 : q ? -1 : 0;

}

#undef NEXT

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 20:16

return (p? 

          (q?

             (p->value < q->value?

                                   -1 

                                  :(q->value < p->value? 1 : 0)) 

             :1)

         :(q? -1 : 0));



=>



return !p? (q? -1 : 0) :

            q? !(p->value < q->value)? !(p->value > q->value)?

            0: 1: -1: 1;



=>



return (p && q)? !(p->value > q->value)? !(p->value < q->value)?

                     0: -1: 1:

                 !p? !q?

                     0: -1: 1;

Also, your code doesn't work.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:16

yes

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:22

And have you tested this "list comparison" function for correctness?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:36

>>4
This is /prog/, I never test code when I post it here!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 5:56



#define NEXT(x) (p = (p)->next)

stopped reading there.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 8:20

>>2
What is this revolting vomitous mess of random input?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:19

what is the purpose of this code? give a segfault?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:33

lol fail

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:42

>>1,7
Same person
>>2-6,8-9,11-
Same person

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:48

>>1-10000,999999,1000000
samefag

>>999
nice dubs!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:48

>>11
nice dubs!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:48

>>14
Nice dubs₆!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:52

>>11-13
Nice dumbs.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:36

Newer Posts

Hey /prog/

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:14

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 20:16

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:16

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:22

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:36

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 5:56

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 8:20

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:19

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:33

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:42

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:48

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:48

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:48

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:52

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:14

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 20:16

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:16

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:22

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 5:56

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 8:20

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:19

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:33

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:36