herro /prog/

ITT we think about the theory behind "uncensorable" forum.
Can it be done theoretically?

a naive method:

client uploads data = encrypt(message,clientpass)
server stores data and replies with sign(hash(data),serverpass)
client replies with clientpass or supplies clientpass when downloading messages.

now .... when the server deletes data, the submitter might be able to prove that the server should have stored it instead (by providing the signature).. but if the submitter isn't around nobody else is going to automatically pick up on the fact that messages are missing from the board.

i think there might be a better way to go about this, trying to figure it out

Why not just use (any( p2p system, you can't really censor them as all the ppers expect the same files, if you modify it, the hash will be different. Centralized systems are likely to fail as the server is the point of failure.

>>2
))

>>2
how is that a foruM?

>>4
U MENA HASKAL!
foruM_

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.