Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Object Oriented Programming

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 15:47

``Object Oriented Programming'' is a buzzword.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 15:49

But is it a scalable turnkey synergetic robust enterprise-grade high quality solution?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 16:15

Even functional programming is object-oriented; it's just that there's only one object and it encompasses everything.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 16:20

>>3
In that case C is object oriented with restriction to the abstract concepts of double, float, char etc...

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 16:22

^everything _is an object!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 16:46

I think the most useful thing OO has to offer is dynamic polymorphism. I also think dynamic polymorphism is overkill in most cases (static polymorphism, be it ad-hoc or parametric, would substitute it just fine) and hence isn't worth all the mind-numbing bullshit cruft OO carries along with it: overdesigned methodologies, annoying best practices, crazy OO zealots, ENTERPRISE TURNKEY SOLUTIONS, etc.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 18:20

I'm sticking with Abstract Data Types instead.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 18:26

I'm sticking with Conses and Atoms instead.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 19:26

I'm sticking with Hacking and Anuses instead.

Object Oriented Programming

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 15:47

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 15:49

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 16:15

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 16:20

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 16:22

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 16:46

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 18:20

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 18:26

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-29 19:26