/prog/ - Java > C

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 13:42

http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
Java = C = C++ ↑ PHP ↓ FIOC ↑↑ C# = VB ↓↓ ObjC ↑↑↑↑ (faggot) Perl ↓ Ruby = JS ↓↓ Delphi ↓ Lisp ↑↑↑↑↑ Pascal ↑↑↑ Asm ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑ *shit nobody cares, especially Ada*

C under Java is disappointing, FIOC over Perl, Ruby and C# is really disapponting.
Note: No Go-lang
Note: LISP
Note: EXPERT Assembly PROGRAMMERS

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 13:45

Lisp climbed FIVE positions. In a few years everyone will program in Lisp! Just you watch!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 13:51

Assembler climbed TEN position. In ONE year everyone will program in Asm! Just you watch!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:12

Objective C climbed FOUR positions. In some years everyone will enjoy homosexual sex! Just you prepare your anus!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:13

Go is 22nd, LOL!!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:19

Laughed at 22, 41 and 50.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:19

PHP ↓
VB    ↓↓
Perl   ↓
JS    ↓↓

Wonderful

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:50

>>1
In top four, there's Java, C++ and PHP. I can't trust that index.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:01

Clearly this is based on web searches. Ergo, higher scores mean more people have more trouble with the language, for whatever reason.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:03

What about Brainfuck?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:18

FIOC ↑↑
HIPSTER AS FUCK

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:33

>>11
U MENA OBJC

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 19:01

ENTERPRISE factorial: http://chaosinmotion.com/blog/?p=622

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 20:01

>>13



(define (memoize f)

  (let ((cache (make-hash)))

    (lambda x

      (cond ((hash-ref cache x #f) => values)

            (else (hash-set! cache x (apply f x)))))))



(define (fact x)

  (if (zero? x) 1

      (* x (fact (- x 1)))))



(define (make-fact (f fact) #:memoize (memoize? #f))

  ((if memoize? memoize values) f))



(define factorial? (exact-nonnegative-integer? . -> . exact-nonnegative-integer?))



(provide/contract

 (make-fact (symbol? #:memoize boolean? . -> . factorial?))

 (fact factorial?))





;; Unnecessary ENTERPRISE-QUALITY factory

;; does what the contract already does

(define (factorial-factory (f fact) #:memoize (memoize? #f))

  (call-with-exception-handler

   (lambda (e) (error 'ihbt.xarn.java.Math.FactorialUtil.FactorialFactoryFactoryFactory.FactorialFactoryFactory.FactorialFactory "can't instantiate class ihbt.xarn.java.Math.FactorialUtil.FactorialFactoryFactoryFactory.FactorialFactoryFactory.FactorialFactory.Factorial"))

   (lambda ()

     (make-fact f #:memoize memoize?))))

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 20:57

>>11
So if Scheme suddenly started being used by everybody, you'd stop using it because it's too hipster?

Enjoy your hypocrisy

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 21:12

>>15
FIOC AS FIOC

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 21:17

http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/paperinfo/tpci/Assembly.html

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 22:48

>>15
^* hipocrisy

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 23:18

>>18
* hypocrysy

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 23:50

>>7
JS ↓↓
wonderful

well written JavaScript with node.js or other engine running with V8 is but legible Lisp

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 23:56

>>20
Lisp with Lisp is legible Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 19:44

<-- check em dubz

Java > C

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 13:42

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 13:45

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 13:51

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:12

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:13

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:19

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:19

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:50

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:01

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:03

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:18

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:33

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 19:01

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 20:01

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 20:57

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 21:12

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 21:17

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 22:48

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 23:18

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 23:50

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 23:56

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 19:44

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 13:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 13:45

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 13:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:13

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:19

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:19

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 14:50

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:18

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 15:33

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 19:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 20:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 20:57

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 21:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 21:17

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 22:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 23:18

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 23:50

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 23:56

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 19:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:35