Drop the meme for a moment. Do you really like BBCode? Outside of /prog/, the dislike for BBCode is nearly universal. Especially among web programmers.
It's too much like HTML without actually being HTML, they argue. "Why don't you just use HTML tags?"
Even amongst /prog/riders, some would prefer Sexpcode instead of BBCode.
Maybe /prog/ is two-faced. You say BBCode rules in /prog/, but outside of /prog/ you might say it sucks. Is world4ch's BBCode different enough to warrant not being grouped together with the BBCode of your average forums?
>>2
Nothing in that thread discussing what I posit here.
Name:
Anonymous2011-01-26 1:42
I like bbcode because it doesn't pretend to be stripped down or otherwise bastardized HTML. It may have been inspired by HTML, but it doesn't attempt to be like HTML.
a tutorial would be nice
‷faggot‴ and no, don't give a fuck about sexp
oh predictable
yes [b][i][sup]b[s]c[/s][/sup][/i]code[/b] is great..
Name:
Anonymous2011-01-26 2:07
>>4
But BBCode is just HTML that uses square brackets instead of angle brackets.
Seriously speaking though, the only difference between BBCode and HTML is that BBCode is presentation and HTML is structure. HTML also used to be presentation, but they deprecated those tags in favor of CSS. Just look at all the BBCode tags, including those outside of /prog/... it tries to be olde HTML really hard.
if we were to use HTML instead of BBCode we'd have to do all
kinds of security measures to prevent javascript injection. this
is a lot harder to get right than implementing BBCode. of course
BBCode *could* use a straight <HTML> syntax, but what would be
the point?
BBCode gives you the option of making up your own tags. [spoiler] and [aa] would be <span class="spoiler"> and <span class="aa"> respectively. That's fucking stupid. You COULD make up your own HTML tags like <spoiler> and <aa>, but how the fuck is that any different from BBCode?