/prog/ - Programming language idea

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 19:32

Hi /prog/,
I have an idea for an esoteric programming language.
It will be called BitFuck and will have bitshift operators for I/O, ambiguos syntax and will have lambdas. Also vectors and hashmaps.

Here's some example code:



template<int n>

struct f { enum { value = n * f<n-1>::value };};

template<>

struct f { enum { value = 1 };};



int main() {

   cout << /* output with bitshift? who would ever think something so stupid! LOL */ f<f<3>::value+1<f<2>::value>::value; // I'm a genious, this shit is unreadable

}

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 20:04

spread the word: thread ignored

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 21:24

lol

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 22:00

To me << and >> were always visual metaphors rather bitshifting operators when used for IO.
As in ``push this shit into the function on the left".

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 23:00

>>4
push this shit into the function
U MONAD HASKAL!
f >>= x

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 4:11

>>1
How the fuck did you manage to sell your indecipherable bullshit toy language to more than half of developers in my company 10 YEARS BEFORE YOU EVEN INVENTED THE LANGUAGE‽^‽_‽

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 5:41

>>1
// I'm a genious, this shit is unreadable

This made me giggle rather heavily

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 6:08

>>7
VALID PERL CODE

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 7:59

>>6
I chortled.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 12:09

>>1:4: error: template specifiers not specified in declaration of ‘template<int n> struct f’ >>1:4: error: redefinition of ‘struct f<n>’ >>1:2: error: previous definition of ‘struct f<n>’ >>1: In function ‘int main()’: >>1:7: error: ‘cout’ was not declared in this scope >>1: At global scope: >>1:2: error: template instantiation depth exceeds maximum of 500 (use -ftemplate-depth-NN to increase the maximum) instantiating ‘struct f<-0x000000000000001f1>’ >>1:2: instantiated from ‘f<-0x000000000000001f0>’ >>1:2: instantiated from ‘f<-0x000000000000001ef>’ >>1:2: instantiated from ‘f<-0x000000000000001ee>’ … >>1:2: instantiated from ‘f<-0x00000000000000003>’ >>1:2: instantiated from ‘f<-0x00000000000000002>’ >>1:2: instantiated from ‘f<-0x00000000000000001>’ >>1:2: instantiated from ‘f<0>’ >>1:2: instantiated from ‘f<1>’ >>1:2: instantiated from ‘f<2>’ >>1:2: instantiated from ‘f<3>’ >>1:7: instantiated from here >>1:2: error: incomplete type ‘f<-0x000000000000001f1>’ used in nested name specifier

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 12:11

>>10
Your BitFuck interpreter is not standard compliant.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 23:08

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 23:00

Damnit, i spent the past hour searching /prog/scrape for this thread, using "genius" as a term... learn to spell, you moron.
More importantly learn to invent a decent language, but spelling should be second on the list.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 17:38

I remember making this thread.

>>13
YHBT.
i spent
IHBT

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-25 16:11

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-25 19:27

I ^snort_giggled a little inside my mouth.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 14:37

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Newer Posts

Programming language idea

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 19:32

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 20:04

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 21:24

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 22:00

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-25 23:00

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 4:11

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 5:41

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 6:08

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 7:59

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 12:09

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-26 12:11

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 23:08

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 23:00

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-04-05 17:38

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-25 16:11

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-10-25 19:27

17 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 14:37