/prog/ - GNU Coding Standards

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-21 18:32

GNU teaches you how to become a terrible programmer:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Coding_Standards

[1] Retarded indentation
[2] use of goto
[3] Struct is not typedef'd
[4] Using &poop instead of a proper pointer
[5] Variables not declared at top of function (ANSI C requires it)
[6] global elements have no namespacing
[7] Expressions are not properly grouped (foo.bar < GIZMO_SNUFKIN_THRESHOLD / 2 is ambigious, what gets executed first? parentheses are your friends)

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 13:26

>>38
nice.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 13:45

>>41
I lol'd

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 14:06

Posting just to get rid of that monstrosity.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 15:34

>>43
nice.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:10

GNU indentation is the best, K&R has to go, Allman is better than K&R but not as easy to pick out scope as GNU

Ive got my IDE set to GNU

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:10

>>44
NICE(1) User Commands NICE(1) NAME nice - run a program with modified scheduling priority SYNOPSIS nice [OPTION] [COMMAND [ARG]...] DESCRIPTION Run COMMAND with an adjusted niceness, which affects process schedul‐ ing. With no COMMAND, print the current niceness. Nicenesses range from -20 (most favorable scheduling) to 19 (least favorable). -n, --adjustment=N add integer N to the niceness (default 10) --help display this help and exit --version output version information and exit NOTE: your shell may have its own version of nice, which usually super‐ sedes the version described here. Please refer to your shell's docu‐ mentation for details about the options it supports. AUTHOR Written by David MacKenzie. REPORTING BUGS Report nice bugs to bug-coreutils@gnu.org GNU coreutils home page: <http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/> General help using GNU software: <http://www.gnu.org/gethelp/> Report nice translation bugs to <http://translationproject.org/team/> COPYRIGHT Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>. This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. SEE ALSO nice(2) The full documentation for nice is maintained as a Texinfo manual. If the info and nice programs are properly installed at your site, the command info coreutils 'nice invocation' should give you access to the complete manual. GNU coreutils 8.8.12-b3c95 January 2011 NICE(1)

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:14

>>46

I find your formatting of man pages for /prog/ absolutely delicious.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:17

>>47

I forgot to mention, even more delicious than CINNAMON-ROLLS.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:22

>>46
I lol'd

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:00

>>46
No manual entry for I lol'd

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:16

>>46,50
nice.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:25

>>50
I lol'd

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:40

>>48
A dreamer of pictures
I run in the night
You see us together,
chasing the moonlight,
My cinnamon rolll.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:11

even though i would never consider programming in anything but
Racket (perhaps some javascript for client UI) i thoroughly enjoy
these C threads.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:14

>>54
Actually, I doubt you ever use Racket. IHBT

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:43

[2] goto's are used in the Linux kernel

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:52

>>56
[2] and everyone bitches about it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 23:20

>>47
I find your formatting of /prog/ absolutely deciduous.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:01

Newer Posts

GNU Coding Standards

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-21 18:32

41 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 13:26

42 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 13:45

43 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 14:06

44 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 15:34

45 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:10

46 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:10

47 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:14

48 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:17

49 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:22

50 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:00

51 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:16

52 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:25

53 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:40

54 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:11

55 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:14

56 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:43

57 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:52

58 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 23:20

59 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-21 18:32

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 13:26

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 13:45

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 14:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 15:34

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:14

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:17

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 16:22

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:00

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:16

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:25

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 17:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:11

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:14

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:43

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 23:20

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:01