Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

/prog/ etiquette

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 9:50


although we love to complain about spam/shit posts, i believe
that given the ε-amount of moderation that goes on here we're
not doing too badly.

writing a bot to destroy /prog/ would be about 5 minutes of
work (2 minutes in racket), yet /prog/ seems to survive and
thrive. I am curious to find out why this is.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 9:51

MrVacBob-kun-sama shelters us.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 9:53

>>1
writing a bot to destroy /prog/ would be about 5 minutes of
work (2 minutes in racket)
Everyone has already done one. (me included, 2 minutes in racket)

/prog/ lives by the power of sage, AbstractBullshite and by generous concession of The Sussman.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 9:54

>>3
writing a bot to destroy /prog/ would be about 5 minutes of
work (2 minutes in racket)

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 9:55

>>3
why does everybody always sage?
i know what it does, but what's the point?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 10:03

>>5
• It's polite.
• Threads in /prog/ don't get deleted, there's no reason to bump a thread.
• New threads will always be on top, old threads progressively go out of the frontpage.
• It maintains the layout of the frontpage, when you refresh the page, you're more likely to find a thread were it was before.
• You can bump a thread without getting flamed, but you need a good reason, like ``the frontpage was full of spam''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 10:04

>>6
I'M ACTUALLY PRETTY OKAY WITH YOU HELPING HIM IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE!!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 10:10

>>7
>>6
DO HELP HIM!!!

Name: HI JACK 2011-01-17 10:15

This thread is now about reasons to stop using web browsers in favor of homebrew /prog/ interfaces:

• it's easier to set /prog/ up to ignore posts without a valid hashcash.

hashcash token: 1:20:110117:/prog/::4OLT3hI8EiL1gq/c:000000000004qSz

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 10:18

>>9
• it's easier to set /prog/ up to ignore posts without a valid JSB-1 signature and auto reply to hashcash-posts to fuck off.

Cons:
("• No BBCode support" . "• No formatting support whatsoever (for CLI interfaces)")

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 10:26

>>5
Hot discussions are taking place in very old saged threads so that the board looks empty for newcomers. Actually, some kind of darknet was created by Lisp geniuses, using the public /prog/ for data persistence. You can access it but you'll have to code a tool to hash your messages and implement SexpCode.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 10:30

>>5
• It makes it harder to find new posts.
• It helps shitposting and spam float to the top.
• It increases the chance of active threads falling off the front page.
• It boosts the ``It's polite to sage in /prog/'' troll's ego.
• It marks you as new here.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 10:36

>>12
• It helps shitposting and spam float to the top.
• It increases the chance of active threads falling off the front page.
see >>6
• You can bump a thread without getting flamed, but you need a good reason, like ``the frontpage was full of spam''.
I never complain when a good thread is bumped, I always bump interesting threads, sage when shitposting, save active threads. But there must be a reason, we're not /b/, we don't get 100k posts per second.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 10:36

>>13
Fuck, I failed my quotes.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 10:43

>>14

As long as the message gets through it doesn't matter.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 10:47

>>15
Little descriptivist dipshit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 11:04

/prog/ has not survived or thrived. There is a tiny minority of serious posters who have remained after this place got taken over by trolls a while back. /prog/ is nothing like it once was and unless we make an a private alternative board, it will eventually die out

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 11:20

>>17
I'm actually kind of fond of this place, when there is actual discussion and the occasional troll. What kind of posts would foster the spirit of old /prog/?.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 11:27

What kind of posts would foster the spirit of old /prog/
how about serious posts (duuuuur) and less shit posts (huuuuur)

the only way that will happen is if we switch to a private moderated forum

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 11:38

>>19
I'd be just fine with it if you went ahead and switched already.

Name: VIPPER 2011-01-17 11:45

>>17
Maybe you should start and die out, un-VIP one.

/prog/ is like a big party and everyone is autistic.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 11:46

>>17
the main problem is that moderators usually lose interest after
some time, after which the abandoned boards degenerate. i don't
think another board is going to solve this mess (unless cudder
comes back with a working rechan, in which case i'll move
instantly of course)...

personally i have created local mirrors for the main boards:
every day at 9AM my scripts download all new posts and present
them to me. i then personally go through every post and rate
them on a scale of 0-9 before they go into my database. this
takes me about 40 minutes.

all traffic in the house is routed through a proxy which
removes posts with a score below 5. using this system, i am
effectively able to moderate the boards for my roommates and
they love me for it.

if you want i can give you access to this proxy, i can guarantee
that it will drastically improve your /prog/ experience.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 12:03

>>18
I'm actually kind of fond of this place, when there is actual discussion and the occasional troll.
You understood /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 12:25

if you want i can give you access to this proxy, i can guarantee
that it will drastically improve your /prog/ experience.
why dont you give EVERYONE the address, then both wishes we be preserved, we will have a moderated forum and the original /prog/ will be maintained for shitposters to troll on

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 12:41

>>24
I don't have the resources to host a public proxy for all of
/prog/, however if you are a truly dedicated Expert Programmer
you can decrypt the code below to reveal my IP. I don't have a
static IP though, so this will stop working after some time.
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Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 13:17

>>25
what is it with you goddamn /g/-fuckers and your Base64 bullshit? Go Away already.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 13:40

>>26
RnVjayBvZmYsIGBgZmFnZ290JycuCg==

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 13:43

>>25
I fucking hate you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 13:43

>>27
Q2hva2Ugb24gYSBjdWRkZXIu

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 13:55

>>25,27,29
This poster is Tumor-complete

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 14:07

>>26

They think it's really 31337 or something like that, obviously the addition of one completely unnecessary layer of complexity is the mark of a horrible programmer.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-17 14:25

>>25
That was profusely entertaining.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-18 5:35

>>25
That's pretty swell, br-- GO FUCK YOURSELF WITH A CACTUS

>>11
I don't believe you.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-15 18:09

check 'em

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List