/prog/ - LISP — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 3:29

It's a slow shit interpreted language, doesn't have libraries, you have only recursion and stack overflow, doesn't have an {b.u.i.o ENTERPRISE-GRADE OBJECT-ORIENTED SYSTEM}, you can do just fact an fibs.
Why do you use it?

Name: Mr. Fail McFail Lulz 2011-01-15 3:31

>>1
Oh god, I failed my SexpCode.

Please, forget the existance of this thread.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 6:55

I use it because I don't program for a living and that's alright.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 7:28

I use Lisp because it features things that I need. Namely, data is code paradigm and DSL, and macros.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 10:17

>>3,4
YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 13:10

You can MOP CLOS enterprise

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 14:23

>>1

0/10

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 14:25

Lisp was implemented by Steve Russell, he figured out how to make Lisp run in a interpreter loop. If it wasnt for Steve, Lisp would have probably ended up looking like ML or Haskell. Many of the features of Lisp like the VM (interpreter), garbage collection and dynamic typing have made an obvious impact on modern programming languages.

Name: >>1,2 2011-01-15 14:25

Why so much? :(

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 14:26

>>8
YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 14:29

>>10
No U

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 14:44

i use lisp because i love parenthese ()

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 15:00

This troll is geting old. Most modern Lisp implementations are both natively compiled, fast, have enough libraries (although not all are well maintained), and "stack overflows" only happen if you're being stupid. My bet is you don't even know Lisp or used it for anything real.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 15:11

This troll is geting old.
Welcome to 4chan.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 15:22

>>13
I'm >>1, a Lisp programmer and YHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 17:54

>>4
data is code paradigm
Enjoy your fail variable bindings.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 19:15

>>16
I already enjoy my hygienic macros, thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 5:20

>>17
Took a few dozen years to come up with a hygienic solution, huh? Further proof that Lispers are fucking retards.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 6:43

>>18
Well, C and C++ have the same problem with ^text_substitution ``~~macros~~''

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 6:48

>>19
text substitution with macros

What the fuck? That's certainly something only a LITHPing inbred fucker would do.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 6:52

>>20

#define faggotmacro(X) X+X



int i = 2;

faggotmacro(++i*5)

I'm being trolled in my thread. It's wonderful

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 6:57

>>21
Welcome to /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 15:36

>>20
Nah man, he was camparing C/C++ macros to text substitution, which is accurate. I love C, but you could probably write the macro portion of the preprocessor in a single line of readable PCRE.

LISP

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 3:29

2 Name: Mr. Fail McFail Lulz 2011-01-15 3:31

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 6:55

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 7:28

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 10:17

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 13:10

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 14:23

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 14:25

9 Name: >>1,2 2011-01-15 14:25

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 14:26

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 14:29

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 14:44

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 15:00

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 15:11

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 15:22

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 17:54

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-15 19:15

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 5:20

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 6:43

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 6:48

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 6:52

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 6:57

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-16 15:36