The application layer

Is it just more or does anybody else here feel that anything above the transport layer is designed by a committee of hipsters and people with Down's syndrome? I bet the guy who designed the Document Object Model passed algorithms 101 by sucking his professors dick

>>1
around here it's impolite for the OP to sage, just lettin you know...

>>2
I didn't mean to, my browser automatically fills the field and I'm too lazy to remove it for that one thread I make every week

>>3
Well, that's your problem.

>>2

Why would that be? I've never seen any rider of /anii/ complain about it before, and I've been lurking for over a year.

>>1
I laughed and agreed.

What do you propose?  We never venture above the transport layer?

>>1
Maybe you haven't used any of the technologies you're criticizing for a sufficiently complex application. Sometimes the additional abstraction is ultimately worth it, even if it seems over-engineered for a ``toy'' project like those ∕prog∕ posters are usually making.

Maybe you haven't used any of the technologies you're criticizing for a sufficiently complex application. Sometimes the additional abstraction is ultimately worth it, even if it seems over-engineered for a ``toy'' project like those ∕prog∕ posters are usually making.
SPRX QUALITY