Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

freebsd vs linux

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-10 20:07

What is the difference between freebsd and linux?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-10 20:08

BSD is(was?) a fork of the 'real' UNIX v7, while Linux is a UNIX-compatible Operating System, written entirely from scratch.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-10 20:10

Theo de Raadt vs Linus Trovalds.

Chose your tyrant.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-10 20:14

ONE WORD POSIX COMPLIANCE THREAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-10 20:49

>>4
what? neither are certified POSIX compliant.  The closest thing to either that is is Mac OS X, which is certified against the Single UNIX Specification

>>2
Linux is certainly not UNIX-compatible.  It's a unix clone.

>>1
In my opinion, the real difference is between FreeBSD and Linux distributions.  Most Linux distributions are a set of discretely packaged components that come together to form a full system (using package build systems and patches to build packages using source from upstream revision control repositories or releases), whereas FreeBSD is built from a single revision control repository.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-11 6:05

>>5
You're really fucking stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-11 12:07

>>6
No arguments ergo your wrong bitch

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-11 12:11

>>7
What about his wrong bitch?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-11 12:15

>>8
Well, from yesterday it's not just his wrong bitch, if you know what I mean.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-11 17:38

linux /dev/hda3
bsd /dev/ad0s3b

more info here http://www.unixweblog.com/2010/03/linux-vs-bsd/

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-11 17:54

>>10
There are too many unmatched “, I couldn't parse it correctly.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:27

>>11
yea it was written quite poorly :o/

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:26

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:08

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:42

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List