Sawfish or StumpWM?
1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-30 21:41
2
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-30 22:31
Not a programming question.
3
Name:
Anonymous 2010-12-30 22:55
>>2
I'm setting up my {i programming} environment.
4
Name:
Anonymous 2010-12-30 23:11
Don't be a masochist; use a real desktop environment and enjoy the convenience
5
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-30 23:12
>>3
Use the one that isn't based on some ad-hoc WTF dialect of Lisp for your {you programming} environment, then.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-30 23:15
>>4
Put a bunch of useless shit on the screen and lose the ability to hack my running WM?
7
Name:
Anonymous 2010-12-30 23:23
Squeak
8
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-30 23:23
>>6
Yes; when you discover that playing with widgets is pointless and you are denied the novelty of hacking your WM, you just might be bored enough to do some actual work.
9
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-31 1:47
you mena xmonad?
10
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-31 3:09
>>8
widgets
What?
you just might be bored enough to do some actual work.
Some of us don't tinker mindlessly just because we can. When my WM needs a hack, I don't want to go through some archaic batch compilation process to do it.
11
Name:
Anonymous 2010-12-31 7:44
I use Sawfish and I haven't even needed to touch a script.
12
Name:
Anonymous 2010-12-31 10:23
dwm bitches.
13
Name:
Anonymous 2010-12-31 11:57
ncurses ftw
14
Name:
Anonymous 2010-12-31 19:56
Emacs is my window manager, file manager, editor, browser, news reader, email client and waifu ;_;
15
Name:
Anonymous 2011-01-01 1:39
I'd like stumpwm more if it had better multihead support.
16
Name:
Anonymous 2011-01-01 7:21
17
Name:
Anonymous
2012-07-15 0:06
DID SOMEONE SAY BUMP?OH GOD!!!!!!