Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

vim and emacs = autism

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 17:16

Ok look, we all know that there is emacs vs vim or whatever, but who cares?  There are so many GUI text editors that are 9 times as efficient as either one of these pieces of shit.  Granted vim is useful when there is no GUI available, but emacs is never useful unless you're an IDIOT.  I can get more work done in GUI than you can in command line.  Grow up

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 17:23

Ok look, we all know that there is Shiichan vs Wakaba or whatever, but who cares?  There are so many GUI image boardss that are 9 times as efficient as either one of these pieces of shit.  Granted Wakaba is useful when there is no image available, but Shiichan is never useful unless you're an IDIOT.  I can get more work done on image boards than you can in text mode.  Grow up

Name: Alpha Male !KBgk.53lJg 2010-12-22 17:24

You just might have the makings of an ALPHA MALE , though your intellect could stand to be improved.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 17:34

I use gedit most of the time, and occasionally even nano

haters gonna hate

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 17:37

I use kate4 most of the time, and occasionally even nano

haters gonna hate

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 17:47

Ok look, we all know that there is svn vs git or whatever, but who cares?  There are so many GUI file browsers that are 9 times as efficient as either one of these pieces of shit.  Granted git is useful when there is no Ctrl+C Ctrl+V available, but svn is never useful unless you're an IDIOT.  I can get more work done in Windows Explorer than you can in command line.  Grow up

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 17:59

Eight Mebibytes And Constantly Swapping
___
Post written in my Vim

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 18:36

inb4 edfag

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 21:32

When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless help screens and cursor positioning code! I just want an EDitor!!
Not a "viitor". Not a "emacsitor". Those aren't even WORDS!!!!
ED! ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!


___
Post written in my EMACS.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 1:51

>>9
I use a needle to write straight to the HDD platters. In before fuck off Randall.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 1:56

>>10
Back to Megan, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 2:29

>>11
I just wrote a reply to that in Microsoft Word in which I utterly decimate you to the point where attempting to recover would be completely useless, but I am saving that for when there are more people to witness your /prog/ death.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 2:48

>>12
That's cool, I'll recover. Fire away.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 13:08

True but:

Vim || Emacs == Masterrace

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 22:51

>>14
Vim || Emacs
#t || #t
#t

Vim && Emacs
#t && #t
#t


Maybe you meant Vim ^ Emacs

Name: catch22 2010-12-24 3:41

I haven't found any editor that really is useful for doing applications so your arguments are all invalid.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 3:55

>>16
ed(1) is the standard editor, therefore you should use only ed. Your argument is invalid.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 6:32

>>15
Masterrace
#t

I don't see the problem here. It's logically sound.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 4:34


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List