>>41
No. But good try though.
If you look carefully you'll see that not all nigger dots correspond to an interlock where the upper ring overlaps on the left.
For instance, the third chain doesn't match against the third dot column under that pattern. (And neither do the last ones)
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-20 6:29
>>40,43
Your second question implies that there's a direct correspondence between a dot pattern and an interlocking pattern.
First and third images feature the same dot pattern but different interlocking patterns.
I smell a trap for autistic children here. Yo'ur a cruel person!
>>42
Nah, you can't assume that since the
●
○
●
corresponded once to the bottom three links then that will always be the case. Compare the first and third groups.
>>44Yo'ur Oh, you.
I never implied it was a bijection between the dot patterns and the interlocking patterns. But there is certainly a relationship. In fact, the relative position of the dot and interlocking patterns is important, that's why you see a little empty box in questiont.png the same size as the little box with the intersecting arcs in rulesui.png. Of course, you'd expect a person with an IQ over 140 (σ=15) to figure that out.
I am autistic, but highly functional. With some minor compulsions about counting1. I have an intense interest in languages2 and their structure which has made me able to convey ideas very clearly on the long run. I have been tested by professionals a few times and have been found to have an IQ at least three standard deviations3 from the normal—tilting upwards. I have taken a few tests to measure the higher spectrum of IQ, but three years after the last one the efforts to norm it have thus far proved futile.
_____________ 1. As an example, I feel compelled to check whether every number I confront is a multiple of three.
2. Be them natural or artificial languages, human or machine. This includes mathematics.
3. Which is pretty useless to accurately designate anything above near-genius intelligence.
>>49
I spend a couple of days per month trading pips in FOREX.
Name:
Anonymous2010-12-20 10:51
anon@anus $ stats -three >>48
Counting...
Searching for three...
Ignoring dividers...
Counting...
Searching for three...
Footnotes: 3
Occurrences of the word "three": 3
Occurrences of the word "I": 6 = 2*3
Occurrences of the word "have": 6 = 2*3
Non-alphanumeric characters: 18 = 2*3*3
Word count: 135 = 5*3^3
Vertical spaces: 3
>>52
I'm not sure if I should be surprised that you have stats program that counts for all those countless things (unlikely), or that you actually wrote that yourself to appear like a program. Mind you, the fact that those reptitive three patterns appear in >>48 is mildly disturbing too.
Could you people also specify if you are lisp wienies or linux users.
I am both a lisp wienie and linux user.
Besides the fact that im not fat and ugly, i am as stereotype as it gets, + them assburgers ofcourse.
>>53
I'm surprised that his version of stats does such a lousy job.
anon@haxus $ stats -three >>48
Counting...
Searching for three...
Ignoring dividers...
Counting...
Searching for three...
Footnotes: 3
Occurrences of the word "three": 3
Occurrences of the word "a","an": 3,3
Occurrences of the word "I": 6 = 2*3
Occurrences of the word "have": 6 = 2*3
Occurrences of the word "to": 6 = 2*3
Non-alphanumeric characters: 18 = 2*3*3
Word count: 135 = 5*3^3
Sentence count: 9 = 3*3
Average sentence length: 15 = 5*3
Maximum sentence length: 30 = 5*2*3
Minimum sentence length: 3
Words with three or more syllables: 12 = 2^2*3
One-letter words: 9 = 3*3
Three-letter words: 15 = 5*3
Name: >>45 = 5*3*3
Post: >>48 = 2^4*3
Vertical spaces: 3
Sum of numbers...
Post body: 12 = 2^2*3
Post name: 45 = 5*3*3
Both: 57 = 19*3
``Auties'' or ``aspergians'' or ``aspies'' or whatever those fucks call themselves are defective humans who don't belong in the gene pool.
For the most part they are worthless calculating devices devoid of creativity or social spontaneity, leading them to become (if, indeed, they were not born as) nothing more than mere specialists - insects whose function consists in no part of any holistic purpose. They are mere pebbles in the massive strata of human endeavour; they are so much run-off, the likes of which history barely notices.
Their ``work'' bears no dignity nor direction, existing simply as logistical assistance to whichever master they've sworn stupid, ignorant loyalty to. An autistic ``person'' is not a person in any respectable sense of the word. They are content to labour - the tool of choice being simply cognitive rather than physical - and derive such joy from this that they never give any consideration to the scope of what foundation they continually lay their bricks upon.
Give me a useful autistic weenie and I'll show you my vagina. But guess what? I have no vagina (unlike every Ass Pie I've ever met). My cock is big and manly and used for renting the world asunder. Because I am arealman.
http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/1740/pqpqmgmg.png
am i inteligent yet? or acoustic? caustic? i forget what we were talking about.
anyway, what the fuck is up with that upper-right dot? that's annoying as hell.
>>73
Correct me if I'm mistaken, but it seems that you just looked around and matched sequences of two horizontal dots and then drew the link corresponding to the right dot. If that's the case, then the sequence ○● corresponds thrice to the upper ring overlapping on the left side and once to the opposite (it is therefore not a one-to-one correspondence, which would mean that the answer is not unique–and it is!).
Also, that upper right dot does not seem to be doing anything naughty from here. Care to elaborate?
>>78
you are indeed mistaken, i did no such thing. this is a bit more advanced than simple pattern matching.
the upper-right dot is off compared the grid (so is the entire left row, but that's not quite as annoying). it doesn't seem to affect the puzzle, it just makes it look a bit exotropic.