Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Why use Set Theory, when we can use Lisp?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 12:40

How can I prove that math is not a pseudoscience?

Name: ­ 2010-11-29 12:40

­

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 12:53

"Esse est percipi" (The perception of the object is that object.)
---
But Mathematics states, that objects exist separate from perception. Thus Math forces so called "objectivism" and is a pseudosicence. Lisp, on the other hand, states that objectes are "lambdas" or "point-free" - that is their perception itself.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 12:59

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 13:09

>>4
These are just hash-tables/tree-maps, not the "abstract infinity unordered sets" from math foundations.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 13:13

satori > set theory

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 13:21

Scientists like to say that science is the organized skepticism, but almost no one speaks out loud the other: science is the organized belief.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 13:22

>>5
Does the set of sets which don't contain themselves contain itself?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 13:25

>>8
define "contain"
define "contain itself"
define "set"
define "set of sets"

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 13:28

You will become famous if you please famous people - and all famous mathematicians like axiomatic set theory. -- Paul Lorenzen, German philosopher and mathematician, who worked in game theory, constructive logic, constructive type theory and constructive analysis.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 13:29

Mathematics is a fanaticism of mechanistic objectivity and objectification. Genuinely "subjective" agents are not acknowledged in hard science--not because they aren't palpable, but because there is an agreement, unstated or stated, not to mention them. -- Henry Flynt and Catherine C. Hennix

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 13:31

The mind of man being finite, when it treats of things which partake of infinity, it is not to be wondered at if it run into absurdities and contradictions, out of which it is impossible it should ever extricate itself, it being of the nature of infinite not to be comprehended by that which is finite. -- George Berkeley

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 13:58

>>9
define "contain"
Include its reference in the hash map.

define "contain itself"
Include in the hash map a reference to itself.

define "set"
Hash map of keys without associated values.

define "set of sets"
Set whose hash map contains references to other sets (which better be immutable).

Now you define "define".

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 14:03

>>13
Okey. Can you present us the exact code, you use to construct "set of sets which don't contain themselves"?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 14:47

ny author who uses mathematics should always express in ordinary language the meaning of the assumptions he admits, as well as the significance of the results obtained. The more abstract his theory, the more imperative this obligation. In fact, mathematics are and can only be a tool to explore reality. In this exploration, mathematics do not constitute an end in itself, they are and can only be a means. -- Maurice Allais, La formation scientifique, Une communication du Prix Nobel d’économie,

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 17:37

>>6
U MENA satori ∈ set theory

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 17:46

>>16
set theory ∈ satori.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 18:27

s∈t satori

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 19:02

s∈tori

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 23:52

s∈t || i

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-30 5:45

(or (∈ s t) i)

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-06 9:55

Back to /b/, ``GNAA Faggot''

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-31 20:48

>>8
noyes

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List