/prog/ - ?: — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:12

How does /prog/ format their nested conditionals? I've been doing this:



foo ? bar :

baz ? quux :

quuux;

What do you find most attractive?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:14

[code]x ? y :
z ? w :
q;

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:14

>>2
[/code]

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:19



hax

? my

: anus

? once

: more

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:29



$a = ($cond == 1)

  ? 'hax'

  : 'anus'

;

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:30

...continued



$a = ($cond == 1)

  ? ($cond2 == 1) 

    ? 'fag'

    : 'hax'

  : 'anus'

;

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:41

"GRUNNUR" ? "GRUNNUR" :

"GRUNNUR" ? "GRUNNUR" :

*

"GRUNNUR"

;

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:47

(cond

  (foo bar)

  (baz quux)

  (t quuux))

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:48



(code (foo bar)

      (baz quux)

      (else quuux))

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:51

>>9
I mean (cond

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:51

>>4-6
How are those in any way readable?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:53

>>9
Obviously that was not the question.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 12:01

(hax < anus)? hax

    : (hax > anus)? anus

    : 0;

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 12:09

>>12
Why would I ever use



(if foo? bar

         (if baz? quux

                  quuux))

When I have cond?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 12:33

>>13
OMG OPTIMIZED

(hax < anus)? hax

    : (hax > anus)? anus

    : "GRUNNUR";

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:01

>>14
Obviously you wouldn't, but C sucks so you must. If you are in doubt about this thread's specificity to C and its imitators, please note the subject.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:04

(aBool) ? "Yes" :

   (anInt > 0) ? "Yes" :

      (anotherInt > 0 && anotherBool) ? "Yes" : "No";

Normally, I try to avoid nesting these things.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:10

>>17
I'd avoid nesting them too, if my formatting was as bad as yours.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:22

a?b:c?d:e?f:g;

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:42

EXPERT TERNARY

!a? !b? !c? !d?
def(): d(): c(): b(): a();

!foo? !baz?
quuux: quux: bar;

!(hax < anus)? !(hax > anus)?
0: anus: hax;

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:46

!a? !b? !c? !d?

  def(): d(): c(): b(): a();



!foo? !baz?

  quuux: quux: bar;



!(hax < anus)? !(hax > anus)?

  0: anus: hax;

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 14:01

>>20
I think I just came a little in my mouth.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 15:56



anus = hurf() ? 0

     : durf() ? 1

     : herp() ? 2

     : derp() ? 3

     :          4;

Conditions in the first column, results in the second column.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 17:48

>>23
Hmm, interesting : placement.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 18:02

>>24
94% sure >>23 is a Haskellite.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 18:16

>>25
U MENA HASKALIAN?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 18:50

>>26
Yes, yes, we get it, you're a one-man army of retards. Now leave /prog/ forever.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 22:18

>>27
Fuck off, ⁶⁶homosexual⁹⁹.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 22:44

Ternary operator considered harmful

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 1:41

``Considered harmful'' considered harmful

Name: 23 2010-11-28 3:28

>>25

I am. The idea for this comes from Perl Best Practices though.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 3:40

>>14



(define-syntax ?

  (syntax-rules (:)

    ((? e1 : r1 : r2)

     (if e1 r1 r2))

    ((? e1 : r1 : r2 ...)

     (if e1 r1 (r2 ...)))))

(? (= 1 2) : 1

   : 2)

; => 2

(? (= 1 2) : 1 :

   ? (= 1 3) : 2 :

   ? (= 1 4) : 3 :

   ? (= 1 1) : 4 :

   5)

; => 4

Name: >>32 2010-11-28 3:41

s/>>14/>>16/

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 3:50

foo ? bar

    : baz ? quux

          : qox

Anything else is wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 7:24

>>34
NESTED CONDITIONALS
as if else if never existed

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 9:18

>>35
DEMOTIVATIONALS
now you can Go back to /b/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 9:27

>>36
I wasn't even thinking that. You appear to have a guilty conscience.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 10:09

>>37
WHO, ME‽.
HAHAHAHAHA, NO.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:23

>>36
Your a fucking faggot and you should kill you're self

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:28

>>39
back to /b/

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:47

^{^{^{^⁶⁶faggots^⁹⁹}}} _{_{_{_₆₆niggers}}99}[/sub][/sub]

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:51

>>34
How do you live with increasing indentation for each step of what is essentially a linear structure?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 12:00

>>40
eat shit and die

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 15:02

>>36-41,43
Personally I'm glad each of you are here, because god help us if this board was actually worth reading.
Also >>20,21 cute...

!if1 ? !if2 ? !if3 ? !if4 ?

  wasnone : was4: was3: was2: was1;

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 4:30

>>35
!if ?NESTED CONDITIONALS
[code]: else if;

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 4:31

>>45
!if ?NESTED CONDITIONALS
: else if;

BB CODE ``faggotry''!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:26

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:

Entire Thread Thread List

?:

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:12

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:14

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:14

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:19

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:29

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:30

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:41

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:47

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:48

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:51

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:51

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:53

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 12:01

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 12:09

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 12:33

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:01

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:04

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:10

19 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:22

20 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:42

21 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:46

22 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 14:01

23 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 15:56

24 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 17:48

25 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 18:02

26 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 18:16

27 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 18:50

28 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 22:18

29 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 22:44

30 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 1:41

31 Name: 23 2010-11-28 3:28

32 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 3:40

33 Name: >>32 2010-11-28 3:41

34 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 3:50

35 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 7:24

36 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 9:18

37 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 9:27

38 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 10:09

39 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:23

40 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:28

41 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:47

42 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:51

43 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 12:00

44 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 15:02

45 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 4:30

46 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 4:31

48 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:26

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:12

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:14

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:14

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:19

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:29

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:30

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:47

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:48

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:51

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:51

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 11:53

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 12:01

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 12:09

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 12:33

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:01

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:04

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:10

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:22

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:42

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 13:46

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 14:01

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 15:56

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 17:48

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 18:02

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 18:16

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 18:50

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 22:18

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-27 22:44

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 1:41

Name: 23 2010-11-28 3:28

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 3:40

Name: >>32 2010-11-28 3:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 3:50

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 7:24

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 9:18

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 9:27

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 10:09

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:23

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:28

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:47

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 11:51

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 12:00

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 15:02

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 4:30

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-29 4:31

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:26