>>13
Most of the article was complaining about Haskell syntax, as if it were some huge build-up to
AND I'M GOING TO CHANGE THAT! (which happened, albeit quite anticlimactically).
There's an entire section on
prefix over infix (``
Haskell operators in Lisp rock!'') with a frankly exhausting number of examples, as if you were pitching a never-before-seen idea.
Obviously the flaws with Liskell required you to reimplement the idea, but I could've told you what's wrong with it without reading the rest of the article, and I don't even write much Lisp or Haskal.