/prog/ - why there is no flow in C?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 15:45

Hi,

in other mainstream languages (to mention: Java, PHP, Python, Perl, C++) there is bright effort to make language better, to create new language versions, fix annoying problems or stole ideas from others. Why it's not like that in C? Why C is so constant!? I mean, I know C is so great and old and Unix and all, but come on, why not add e.g. namespaces?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 15:48

Because.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 15:54

>>1
your fucking dog is dead. sorry bro :(

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:06

ONE WORD C1x THREAD OVER
also compatibility

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:07

flow MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:46

>namespaces
>C

full retard

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:49

More retarded is using those shitty prefixes in every function you have to simulate namespaces.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:50

There already are namespaces in C, you fools. They're just not user-definable.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:52

i'd like to see a foreach

eg

int i,j

for(each x;i,j) {
haxmyanus(x)
}

basically it would just be synatatic sugar for a temporary array to store the values, and an assignment to the loop value at the beginning of each loop

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 17:09

>>9
"[code]" Tags. use them.

Also, foreach is available for C++.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 17:10

The D Programming Language.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 17:11

but D isn't more like improvement of C++?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 17:13

>>12
Everything is like improvement of C++?.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 17:14

No, Haskell and Lisp aren't

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-18 20:14

>>1
Because C is already perfect.

why there is no flow in C?

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 15:45

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 15:48

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 15:54

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:06

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:07

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:46

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:49

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:50

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 16:52

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 17:09

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 17:10

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 17:11

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 17:13

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-17 17:14

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-18 20:14