Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Thinking in C++

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-14 12:54

How good are "Thinking in C++" and the runner-up slide show "Thinking in C" ? I've just started in on Thinking in C, and it seems p. ok but it might turn to shit later. Is it worth going through?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-14 12:56

Thinking in C/C++.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-14 13:09

>>2
Thinking in 1 (with the side effect that C is incremented)

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-14 13:30

>>1
Thinking in C or C++ is not a thing you want to do, even if you're programming in them. Try Thinking Forth instead.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-14 14:20

>>4

I do Embedded Programming - I can't think of a more appropriate language than C. Thinking in C++ is more for the extension. There's a "Thinkin in Java," too, but I'm afraid of even cracking the book open. It's probably all Ïa Ïa Java Ftaghn!

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-14 14:35

>>5
Still not appropriate. C is neither low-level enough to be useful for thinking in, nor high-level enough to be useful for thinking in.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-14 14:41

I think in Lisp

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List