1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-11 15:39
What is the shittiest famous library, in your opinion, and why?
27
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-12 11:31
>>24
I agree. It's ridiculous that they let naïve O(n
[sup] 2[/sup) (and worse
! ) implementations in a standard library.
29
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-12 13:28
>>27
Just look at him.
>>27- kun is aware of ï, but he can't type neither ² nor
2² .
31
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-13 17:02
>>29
nor he can write backwards.
or make the timestamp backward.
32
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-13 20:09
>>31
Your mother must be so proud.
33
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-13 22:49
>>32
Your mother must be proud of how big your dick has gotten lately.
35
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-14 0:28
>>34
That's not a compliment, Mr
inbreed
38
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-14 8:18
the python standard library
39
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-14 8:35
>>38
>and why?
you left most important part
40
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-14 8:40
>>39
you left the fucking article
41
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-14 11:34
>>38
The Python stdlib is probably one of the best standard libraries I've seen.
43
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-14 13:14
>>40
My native language has no such shit as articles. So your language does not need them too.
44
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-14 13:32
>>43
Your native language is 日本語なのか?
45
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-14 14:24
His native language is probably Auld Etruscan or something equally retarded.
46
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-14 17:12
>>42
Work a little harder and give us some examples of standard libraries you consider good.
47
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-14 23:42
The javascript standard library comes to mind. It was designed after the java library by edict, which is a rather foolish thing to do to an otherwise completely different language.