P=NR Proof
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-27 22:38
P=NP
P/P = N
1 = N
P = NP
P = (1) P
P = P
I just solved a million dollar question, u jelly?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-27 22:39
lol how original... NOT
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-27 22:59
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-27 23:00
u jelly
FUCKING DIE IN A FIRE ALREADY I AM FUCKING TIRED OF SEEING YOU MOTHERFUCKER
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-27 23:03
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-27 23:28
I just saw this in /sci/.
Go back there and make a few more RELIGION vs. SCIENCE threads, will ya?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-27 23:58
Ignoring the most obvious wrongness here, you're not even doing the math right. You just proved that P = NP, given that P = NP. IHBT
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-28 10:05
Your proof is not correct because you proved P=NP, not P=NR as you claimed in abstract of your paper.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-06 10:00
Back to /b/, ``GNAA Faggot''
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 20:35
<-- check em dubz
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-03 4:07