Simplest Program
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-21 17:38
What is the most universally simplest program that compiles?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-21 17:42
int main;
Name:
>>2
2010-10-21 17:44
Or actually just main; if you can coax your compiler into K&R mode.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-21 17:53
What's the most universally complex program that compiles?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-21 18:02
LLVM
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-21 18:03
>>4
The vanilla PHP interpreter.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-21 18:07
section .text
global _start
_start:
mov eax, 1
mov ebx, 0
int 0x80
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-22 2:21
>>8
U MENA
.text
.global _start
_start:
movl $1, %eax
movl $0, %ebx
int $0x80
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-22 3:17
>>9
U MENA
.globl
also, fuck AT&T syntax, long live Intel syntax
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-22 3:53
$ echo >empty
$ cc -c empty
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-22 4:48
>>11
where is the newline
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-22 5:58
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-22 5:59
>>13
>>12-san asked first
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-22 9:22
>>9
Please, for the sake of humankind, use Intel syntax.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-22 17:46
>>15
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OF GCC INLINE-ASSEMBLY, HAVE YOU ?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-24 12:07
<code>ret</code>
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-24 12:08
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-24 13:05
>>18
LOL EPIC FAIL BOXY FAIL EPIC
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-24 14:10
>>16
Actually I have but have you heard of
.intel_syntax noprefix?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-24 14:20
This thread has been closed and replaced with the following thread:
Subject: Using the .intel_syntax directive in GCC inline assembly.
Name:
Email:
It doesn't work.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-09 10:58
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-03 4:32
Name:
Anonymous
2013-01-19 23:16
/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.