/prog/ - Imperative > Declarative*

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-13 16:10

_{^*Only true on computers which have memory (state) and execute instructions.}

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-13 16:29

They are both Touring complete, and therefore equivalent.

Name: Lance ARMstrong 2010-10-13 16:38

I'm Touring-complete, too.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-13 16:49

Oh man, we've had this discussion 1342384762837 times. I wish /prague/ had stackoverflow's feature of checking the archives and asking the OP if that's the thread he's looking for before posting.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-13 18:45

>>4
And we will keep having this discussion until /pork/ understands that >>1 is correct.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-13 19:52

>>5
youve just been HURT FEELINGS AND BUTT RANGED go drink ur moms bredt milk u fart commander i bet u hav a fetish FOR MEN LMAO ur just so made all the time its 2 easy 23 own u "i like to drnikj sperm from my spermbottle while waring my sperm necklace" - u

Name: 2010-10-14 1:31

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 9:13

Stupid thread, simply because the operator depends on the user's criteria. OP's criteria obviously disregards programmer time as something important.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 10:33

OP also disregards hybrid languages from this point of view. OP is a fag.

Name: 2010-10-23 11:57

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:54

<-- check em dubz

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:29

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:

Entire Thread Thread List

Imperative > Declarative*

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-13 16:10

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-13 16:29

3 Name: Lance ARMstrong 2010-10-13 16:38

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-13 16:49

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-13 18:45

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-13 19:52

7 Name: 2010-10-14 1:31

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 9:13

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 10:33

10 Name: ​​​​​​​​​​ 2010-10-23 11:57

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:54

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:29