Java Mic levels
1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 8:50
Hi,
I'm trying to access the level of the mic through Java.
I don't need to record anything, I just want to know a relative scale of sound level.
Is this possible in real-time?
2
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 8:56
chmod -w+r mic
3
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 9:00
impossible
4
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 9:23
/g/ says it's easy but doesn't want to help me...
And I think my mic is already read-able
5
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 9:30
You'll need the Java Native Sound Input and Output Libraries .
6
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 9:35
Gee, and those are $300. nice
7
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 9:37
>>4
/g/ says it's easy but doesn't want to help me...
While the /g/ people are cretins, they are good at hot helping other cretins.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 9:41
s/hot/not/
9
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 9:42
Mmm, let's specify:
This could also work.
Start recording when the level is over a certain value, stop when the level drops under a certain level for a certain time
Is this possible?
10
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 9:45
Like, maybe, recording bits of a quarter second and reading it's volume, and if it's under the threshold stop recording
11
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 9:50
What about it is volume? Are you brain-dead?
12
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 9:54
>>11
Not brain-dead, just tired and not a native speaker.
//its volume//
13
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 10:21
Forget it, you can only access mic from Scheme.
Read SICP to find out how.
14
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 10:47
>>13
So SICP is kinda /prog/s way of saying install gentoo?
15
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 10:52
>>14
Kinda, except it's good advice generally.
16
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 11:04
>>14
Not saging is /prog/s[
sic ] way of saying "I'm a fucking idiot.".
17
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 11:16
>>16
So, now I'm one of the cool guys?
Seriously though
18
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 11:41
>>16
Posting is
/prog/ way of saying "I'm a fucking idiot."
19
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 11:54
>>18
Are you calling
Xarn an idiot?
20
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 12:06
>>19
fuck off back to twitter
21
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 12:50
So... no real answers?
22
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 12:51
>>21
One does not simply walk in to
/prog/ and expect answers.
23
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 13:10
>>21
As a wiseman once said, ``
SECONDLY, THIS IS /prog/ DO NOT DEMAND USEFUL ANSWERS THE WAY YOU WANT THEM TO BE ''.
Either wait for that guy who helps everybody or go to stackoverflow, where your question belongs.
24
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-09 14:41
that guy
27
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-06 9:46
B a c k t o / b / , ` ` G N A A F a g g o t ' '
28
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-08 23:26