Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

The Myth of Technological Progress

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 5:44

The Myth of Technological Progress



"Many of you will still be alive in 50 years. It’s interesting to think about what life will be like in 50 years technologically and otherwise. Predictions are risky, especially when they’re about the future, but I believe we can make some pretty good guesses. To predict a predictable future, you need to look at the past. What was technological life like 50 years ago? 50 years ago was 1959. The world of 1959 is pretty much the same world we live in today technologically speaking. This is a vaguely horrifying fact which is little appreciated. In 1959, we had computers, international telephony, advanced programming languages like Lisp, which remains the most advanced programming language, routine commercial jet flight, atomic power, internal combustion engines about the same as modern ones, supersonic fighter planes, television and the transistor....."

Source: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t731950/

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 6:11

0/10

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 6:21

Lisp, which remains the most advanced programming language

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 9:20

Keep telling yourself that. Maybe one day you'll believe it's true.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 10:54

There was a computer in everybody's pocket in 1959.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 11:04

>>1
The garbage collector was also so slow in Lisp so you just coded until you ran out of memory and then went home and let the garbage collector do it's job during the night.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 11:15

I think we've had this thread at least ten times by now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 11:31

>>7
We've had every possible thread at least ten times by now. All that's left is the ongoing decline into /g/.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 12:13

>>8
:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 15:13

>>1
50 years from now is post-Singularity, so making predictions about such a time is meaningless.  See you on the other side...

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 16:16

>>10
I'm sure they will be saying that same line in 50 years too.

Just like they've been saying fusion power is 20 years away...since 1975.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 20:07

ITS ALL FUCKING CIRCLES

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 20:24

>>12
QFT

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-06 21:38

Predictions are risky, especially when they’re about the future

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-07 0:48

>>14
ROFL

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-09 7:01

>>10
Sussman-Singularity?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-09 7:31

1960no SICP, anywhere on the planet.
2010universal access to SICP from any point on Earth with internet connectivity.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-09 23:05

LISP vs SICP...

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-10 18:24

>graphene
>carbon nanotubes
>packet radio, then wifi
>handheld teleconferencing (fucking took long enough)
>neural implants (though the research for this began in the 60s)
>cross-continent uav drones
>nootropics
>search engines
>wiki software that anybody can run
>quad core processors for domestic use

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-10 22:21

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░▄▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░▄▀░▄▀░▄▀▄░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░▄▀░▄▀░▄▀░░░▀▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░█▀▄░░░░▀█░▄▀░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░
░░░▄▀▄░▀▄░▀▄░░░░▀░░░░▄█▄░░░░▀▄░░░
░▄▀░░░▀▄░▀▄░▀▄░░░░░▄▀░█░▀▄░░░░▀▄░
░█▀▄░░░░▀▄░█▀░░░░░░░▀█░▀▄░▀▄░▄▀█░
░▀▄░▀▄░░░░▀░░░░▄█▄░░░░▀▄░▀▄░█░▄▀░
░░░▀▄░▀▄░░░░░▄▀░█░▀▄░░░░▀▄░▀█▀░░░
░░░░░▀▄░▀▄░▄▀░▄▀░█▀░░░░▄▀█░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░▀▄░█░▄▀░▄▀░░░░▄▀░▄▀░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░▀█▀░▄▀░░░░▄▀░▄▀░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▀▄░▄▀░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░█░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░▄▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░▄▀░▄▀░▄▀▄░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░▄▀░▄▀░▄▀░░░▀▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░█▀▄░░░░▀█░▄▀░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░
░░░▄▀▄░▀▄░▀▄░░░░▀░░░░▄█▄░░░░▀▄░░░
░▄▀░░░▀▄░▀▄░▀▄░░░░░▄▀░█░▀▄░░░░▀▄░
░█▀▄░░░░▀▄░█▀░░░░░░░▀█░▀▄░▀▄░▄▀█░
░▀▄░▀▄░░░░▀░░░░▄█▄░░░░▀▄░▀▄░█░▄▀░
░░░▀▄░▀▄░░░░░▄▀░█░▀▄░░░░▀▄░▀█▀░░░
░░░░░▀▄░▀▄░▄▀░▄▀░█▀░░░░▄▀█░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░▀▄░█░▄▀░▄▀░░░░▄▀░▄▀░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░▀█▀░▄▀░░░░▄▀░▄▀░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▀▄░▄▀░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░█░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-10 23:51

CANCER

CANCER CANCER CANCER

In 1959 you couldn't even SPEAK the word cancer in public - it was like shouting "I love the GPL!" at a Microsoft board meeting.  These days, a large amount of cancers don't kill us, and chemo is less likely to horribly mutilate us.  Besides, comparing today's computers to those of 1959 is like looking at the Hoover dam and saying "Beavers can do that, you retard.  It's nothing special."  Oh, and there's BILLIONS of them.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-11 10:55

People have built wind-propelled cars that can sail faster than the wind.  That's something that has eluded mankind for the thousands of years we've been harnessing air currents to do our bidding.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-11 14:01

But have they built wind-propelled cdrs?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-11 14:09

>>21
it was like shouting "I love the GPL!" at a Microsoft board meeting.

Incidentally, Microsoft is now pushing all the people on its blogging platform onto Wordpress

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-11 22:50

sump

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-12 2:49

>>24
The same wordpress that's in the main Debian repos?

GREAT SUCCESS

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-12 2:59

>>23
you can throw a cd-r pretty far if you catch the wind right on a blustery day

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-12 5:37

>>27
you can throw a cd-r but you can't throw a cdr

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-12 6:11

"Computer networks came a year or two after 1959 and didn’t change very much, other than how we waste time in the office, and whom advertisers pay." congrats, youre a donut.

Name: VIPPER 2010-10-12 14:44

>>6
The garbage collector was also so slow in Lisp so you just coded until you ran out of memory and then went home and let the garbage collector do it's job during the night.
Are you saying that this is no longer the case?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-12 16:13

>>30
fuck off, ``vipper''

Name: VIPPER 2010-10-12 16:26

>>31
No.

Name: VIPPER 2010-10-12 17:56

>>32
JEWS
I said JEWS, AM I EDGY AND COOL?

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-12 18:57

>>30
Hasn't been true for over 30 years.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-12 21:36

>>30
That's still better than Java.  I believe the proper way to run the Java garbage collector is exec( asm(HALT) );

Name: VIPPER 2010-10-13 5:02

>>33
I said JEWS, AM I EDGY AND COOL?

You can do more VIPPER.

JEWS JEWS

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 5:10

>>36
Double Nigger

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 5:31

                       //`'''```,
             o        // LISP   `.,
       ,....OOo.   .c;.',,,.'``.,,.`
    .'      ____.,'.//
   / _____  \___/.'
  | / ||  \\---\|
  ||  ||   \\  ||
  co  co    co co

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 10:01

LISP has been the future for decades.
Just like UNIX.

Name: VIPPER 2010-10-14 10:40

>>39
Makes me wish i was a homo whore instead of a geek.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 11:13

Given C or C++ is more advanced than Java due to manual memory management and more complicated syntax,
then Java is more advanced than Lisp.

QED

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 11:22

>>41
Given C or C++ is more advanced than Java due to manual memory management
I don't think I'll give you that at all.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 11:33

>>41
Cretin.

C > Java and C > Lisp does not say anything about Java > Lisp.

Get the fuck out.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 11:48

>>43
It's a transitive relationship. Of course it does.

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 12:19

>>44 Please stop trolling but pretending to not understand what transitive is.

Name: >>45 2010-10-14 12:20

s/but(?= )/by/

Name: Anonymous 2010-10-14 18:16

I was in a transitive relationship once, and I'd have to say it's just not worth it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 17:03

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List