Boolean
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 15:26
So, how much does /prog/ know about boolean logic?
I'll start you all off easy, what is the equivalent of
xor, eax eax?
(Don't give me shit about that being a machine code sample)
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 15:33
0
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 15:34
What are you talking about, programming has nothing to to do with boolean logic whatsoever.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 15:53
Less of this.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 15:55
sage
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 16:03
I'll start you all off easy, what is the equivalent of
xor, eax eax?
That doesn't mean anything.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 16:33
This is so gay
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 16:53
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 18:34
eax ^ eax
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 19:30
>>6
it's called polish notation
>>2
correct
>>1
IHBT
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 19:53
Boolean logic is easy. Learn boolean algebra (you know, the kind of lattice). It's also easy.
& = meet
| = join
~ = complement
0 = bottom
1 = top
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 19:54
>>11
Excuse me, missed a "-" on the 1. Should read:
-1 = top
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 19:55
hufflepuff
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 20:01
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 20:46
>>1
sets the content of the eax register to 0
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 20:49
>>15
forgot to mention, fasmfag here.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 21:21
I've read Kleene, author of Kleene Star
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 22:52
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 23:22
>>17
I've included some Kleene stars below if you need extras, I bought too many of them when I was a CS student.
********************************************
***************************************
************
******************************************
**************************************
*******************************************
**********************
Please don't take them if you're not going to use them.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 23:32
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 0:03
>>19
Are these compatible with my A-star implementation, or do I have to get them retrofitted somehow?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 2:46
I've included some Klein stars but they collapsed
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 22:20
niggervaginas
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 22:25
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 22:30
>>24
pussydicks is only correct on a 64-bit machine where eax > 2^32
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 23:04
>>25
eax is 32-bits even on x86-64 machines. I believe you are referring to rax, of which eax is the least-significant 32-bit subset.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 23:20
>>26 Thanks for the correction :)
I don't know much about 64 bit processors.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-28 6:49
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-28 18:16
Question 2:
~(a xor b) does what?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-28 19:04
xor, eax eax?
That's bitwise, not boolean. ``faggot''.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-28 22:39
>>29
~(a ^ b) = (~a) ^ b = a ^ (~b)
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 4:50
U MENA xor eax, eax
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 5:56
This thread has been closed and replaced with the following thread:
Subject: How do you pronounce ``xor, eax eax''?
Name:
Email:
1. zoreacksecks
2. exclusive-or extended accumulator register extended accumulator register
3. ecks-or ee-ay-ecks ee-ay-ecks (faggot)
4. xudder
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 6:17
>>33
3. ecks-or ee-ay-ecks ee-ay-ecks (faggot)
fuck you
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 6:34
zor meep meep
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 8:41
zoreackseacks
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 9:13
cksaw ee-ax ee-ax
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 10:58
DERP DERP DERP HURRR DERP NARF EX
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 10:59
egsor, ex, ex
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 11:00
Shouldn't that read `xor eax, eax' ?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 11:19
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 11:50
lea hcul, ver
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 13:49
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-29 14:45
xor ee-ay-ecks, ee-ay-ecks
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-09 4:59