/prog/ - I feel — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 13:21

I am witnessing the end of /prog/.

Good night sweet prince.

Signed,

The guy who emailed the Sussman on Dolphin Linux.

Sign below if you contributed to the /prog/ culture.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 13:28

I did. I was a expert user of HMA derivates, and also submitted some fine solutions to various prog challenges

Name: VIPPER 2010-09-20 13:32

>>1
I am witnessing the end of /prog/.

I did many times, nothing new here.

I have seen worse.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 13:32

Signed,

The guy who wrote Schemeworld.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 13:38

>>3
I haven't, and I've been here 3 years. Kudos if you've been here longer. /prog/ has had many things, and spam has always been a problem, but we are going to end up with a captcha :(

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 13:49

>>5
Right now it doesn't look like automated, it will pass

Name: VIPPER 2010-09-20 14:11

>>5
I haven't, and I've been here 3 years. Kudos if you've been here longer
4 maybe 5 years, i cant remeber that well.
But i remember that it was /prog/ who got me into programming.
but we are going to end up with a captcha :(
Like its a bad thing, only shitposters dont like captchas.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:14

On second thought this might cure our 'sage' obsession...

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:18

Signed, someone who was in #sicp when that guy came in to get the info for the "save /prog/" thread.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:23

/prog/ isn't at its best right now, but it's been a lot worse. We've weathered the summer of 2010 and came out relatively unscathed. We just need a good challenge thread now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:30

>>10
Challenge: make /prog/ not suck

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:33

I'd love to make a great challenge, however I don't know shit about programming, what do you want to program/do?

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:45

Signed,
the ``Fuck off, ``faggot''.'' guy

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:52

Signed,
The guy who made the original "opiates" thread. Oh God, what hath I wrought.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:57

>>12
You need to fuck off from /prog/ if you don't know anything about programming.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 15:05

Signed,
the Sussman.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 15:09

Signed,
Expert Java advocate of the old /prague/.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 15:52

>>17
U MENA OLD /B/

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 15:56

>>15

But I'm not a shit poster :'(

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 15:58

Signed,
ja;dr & stab over ip

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 16:00

Signed,
the guy who used sqlite to memoize his fibs

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 16:04

Signed,
The guy who contributed nothing but Java programming tips

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 16:14

>>21
vroom vroom

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 16:18

Signed,
The guy who used esoteric languages in /prog/ challenges and conjured up some FIOC once in a while.

(In the current opiates-y state of /prog/, I don't think I'll bother sageing this. Sorry.)

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 17:16

You know, we wouldn't be in this situation if one idiot didn't think wasting 90 minutes to sagetank a thread that would be recreated in seconds was a good idea.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 17:57

>>25
Right. Blame someone trying to clean up /prog/ instead of the idiot shitting things up. The sagetank guy was obviously fighting a losing battle, but fuck you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 17:59

Sined,
y² + x² = k

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 18:31

>>25
In the same way that rape victims are at fault for having a vagina and people who get mugged are to blame for ever leaving their houses. You're the same guy who blamed the people who got sick of the Xarn basher shitting up every thread distantly related to Xarn for killing conversation, aren't you?

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 19:58

So are you going to go away, because that'd be kind of neat.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 21:15

>>28
Eat shit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 22:53

>>26
You thought the proper response to a shit thread was to spam it instead of ignore it. Now look at how many problems you have.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 4:49

>1-
You Kings of /secretareaofhaxx/

Name: >>26 2010-09-21 6:15

>>31
I'm not the sagetank guy. The ``problems'' we have now are insignificant; as soon as a mod wakes up, the threads will be deleted and the idiot posting them will be banned.
Actually reporting shit behavior to mods is far more productive than attacking people for caring about the quality of /prog/. The biggest problem on /prog/ isn't children misunderstanding what VIP means, or even Java users and homework threads. It's idiots like you, who are so afraid of rocking the boat that they'll attack anyone trying to fix leaks.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 6:20

>>33
I think Mr~~^Vac_Bob~~, the only moderator here, only does things when summoned.

Name: VIPPER 2010-09-21 7:21

>>33
children misunderstanding what VIP
JEWS

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 9:35

>>34
What about using his formspring?

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 10:30

>>33
Now you go off on a tangent avoiding the point that you think spam is a fix. And here I was thinking this board liked distancing itself from /b/.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 11:00

>>37
You're an idiot. We can agree that the sagetank guy was wasting his time at best, but blaming him for something that is plainly the fault of the spammer is retarded.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 11:38

>>38
Unless SPAWHBTC.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 12:12

>>39
What was that travesty?

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 12:14

>>40
lrn2prog

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 12:22

>>41
Back to the imageboards, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 12:39

>>42
implying a certain (idiot) mentality is limited to one place

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 12:49

>>43
I hope you're being ``ironic'' with that '>implying shit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 13:10

>>44
Hipster detected

I feel

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 13:21

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 13:28

3 Name: VIPPER 2010-09-20 13:32

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 13:32

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 13:38

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 13:49

7 Name: VIPPER 2010-09-20 14:11

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:14

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:18

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:23

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:30

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:33

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:45

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:52

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 14:57

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 15:05

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 15:09

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 15:52

19 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 15:56

20 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 15:58

21 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 16:00

22 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 16:04

23 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 16:14

24 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 16:18

25 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 17:16

26 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 17:57

27 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 17:59

28 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 18:31

29 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 19:58

30 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 21:15

31 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-20 22:53

32 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 4:49

33 Name: >>26 2010-09-21 6:15

34 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 6:20

35 Name: VIPPER 2010-09-21 7:21

36 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 9:35

37 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 10:30

38 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 11:00

39 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 11:38

40 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 12:12

41 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 12:14

42 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 12:22

43 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 12:39

44 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 12:49

45 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 13:10