Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

It's hard to read /███/ sometimes

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-17 7:34

Kimmo Alm aka "Sysop" from AnT has been spamming us for YEARS now, and has recently stepped it up. This shit has got to fucking stop. As promised, here are all of the e-mails he has sent me over the years (and my responses).
 
We've done all we can do about him. We've banned THOUSANDS of proxies, and deleted OVER A HUNDRED THOUSAND spam posts. His attacks continue though. I'm out of ideas at this point.
 

This text contains all of the e-mails Kimmo Alm aka Sysop has sent me. It also contains all of my responses, and a few of the e-mails sent to our host.
It's formatted kind of poorly. If anyone wants to clean this up/HTMLize it so it's easier to read, be my guest. Just e-mail it to me and I'll host it.
 
See http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Anontalk.com for the backstory. The short of it is Kimmo has been spamming 4chan for YEARS.
We've banned THOUSANDS of IPs, and deleted at least a hundred thousand spam posts at this point.
He spams 4chan to advertise his website, which is really just a haven for pedophiles.
 
On to the fun stuff! (My comments in '**'s)
 
=====================
 
**Here's the first e-mail he ever sent. He later claims he didn't, but that's bullshit (see headers).**
 
=====================
 
To: moot@4chan.org
Subject: Why bully loli?
From: "Kimmo Alm" <kimmoa@gmail.com>;;
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:31:10 +0100
Message-ID: <tl76l8s88f86cr@kimmoa.bredbandsbolaget.se>;">tl76l8s88f86cr@kimmoa.bredbandsbolaget.se>">op.tl76l8s88f86cr@kimmoa.bredbandsbolaget.se>;;
 
Why do you bully loli?
 
=====================
 
**Why yes, I'd love to exchange links with someone who has been spamming my website for 1.5 years!**
 
=====================
 
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:41:33 +0100
To: moot@4chan.org
Subject: Link exchange
Reply-To: sysop@anontalk.com
From: "AT Sysop" <m84c092d@gmail.com>;;

Wanna exchange permanent links?

=====================
 
**This is the first real converastion I've ever had with him.**

=====================
 
To: admin@4chan.org
Subject: Please respond to this test.
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:47:49 +0100
From: "AT Sysop" <sysop@anontalk.com>;;

Hello. Please respond to this if you are reading it. We both want to end 
attacks and spam on both boards.
 
---
 
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:54:57 -0500
From: moot <moot@4chan.org>;;
To: AT Sysop <sysop@anontalk.com>;;
Subject: Re: Please respond to this test.
 
I'm pretty sure any problems you have with 4chan would disappear if you
stopped advertising/"spamming" on 4chan.
 
 
On 2/4/10 6:47 PM, AT Sysop wrote:
Hello. Please respond to this if you are reading it. We both want to end
attacks and spam on both boards.
 
---
 
To: moot <moot@4chan.org>;;
Subject: Re: Please respond to this test.
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:17:27 +0100
From: "AT Sysop" <sysop@anontalk.com>;;
 
I'm pretty sure any problems you have with 4chan would disappear if you 
stopped advertising/"spamming" on 4chan.
 
(Apparently, you don't know your own users...)
 
I did send you several e-mails about this in the past but they apparently 
got ignored. I hope that you will read and consider this, in case you 
actually never got the old e-mails. Or maybe reconsider it, if you did and 
just ignored them.
 
None of us like each other, obviously, but I still seriously propose that 
we set up some sort of mutual link exchange. This would obviously cut down 
on any spam to the level of "few trolls trying to stir up a war", and 
hopefully, not even that would happen after a while.
 
I actually used to have a free banner text for 4chan, linking to "/b/" 
with a text such as "Tired of using your brains? Relax and enjoy images." 
(or something alone those lines). I would be prepared to bring that back, 
as well as removing all the banned phrases related to "4chan". In return, 
I expect you would put a rotating text or graphical banner (doesn't 
matter) on the 4chan boards. It doesn't need to get heavy "weight" or 
anything, as long as it sticks around and is permanent.
 
I really think that this would solve a ton of problems and I frankly 
cannot imagine why you would turn this offer down at this point. 
Hopefully, you will not. We don't need to like each other. The two boards 
obviously serve completely different needs, and I would very happily get 
rid of "sloppy" posters who just want to use memes and such. At the same 
time, I do recognize that there are people with brains surfing your board, 
and nothing stops them from using both.
 
As I suggested the last time, I'm OK with rather "unflattering" ad texts 
such as: "Feeling anal-retentive? Then check out AnonTalk.com!". However, 
it would be nice if we could agree on the specifics. I'm prepared to do 
this within hours.
 
Think about it. Nobody (or at least much fewer) would have a reason to 
spam/"raid" either board if both link to each other, while agreeing to 
disagree.
 
Excitedly awaiting your response.
 
---
 
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:30:53 -0500
From: moot <moot@4chan.org>;;
To: AT Sysop <sysop@anontalk.com>;;
Subject: Re: Please respond to this test.
 
This is the only e-mail I've received from you:
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Why bully loli?
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:31:10 +0100
From: Kimmo Alm <kimmoa@gmail.com>;;
To: moot@4chan.org

Why do you bully loli?

-

We don't do any external links, besides paid banner ads. Essentially
you're extorting a text link out of me to stop spamming 4chan?
 
Nobody (or at least much fewer) would have a reason to spam/"raid"
either board if both link to each other, while agreeing to disagree.
 
4channers wouldn't give two shits about AnonTalk if you stopped spamming
4chan. All you've done for the past two years is use spam on 4chan as a
means to advertise your website.
 
---
 
To: moot <moot@4chan.org>;;
Subject: Re: Please respond to this test.
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:35:36 +0100
From: "AT Sysop" <sysop@anontalk.com>;;
 
This is the only e-mail I've received from you:
 
What the hell? I definitely haven't sent anything related to "bullying 
loli", and especially not to you. That must be yet another person 
pretending to be me.
 
I've sent several e-mails such as this one a number of months ago. They 
never received any replies.
 
We don't do any external links, besides paid banner ads. Essentially 
you're extorting a text link out of me to stop spamming 4chan?
 
No, that's not what I'm saying. Did you read the letter?
 
Nobody (or at least much fewer) would have a reason to spam/"raid" 
either board if both link to each other, while agreeing to disagree.
>
4channers wouldn't give two shits about AnonTalk if you stopped spamming 
4chan. All you've done for the past two years is use spam on 4chan as a 
means to advertise your website.
 
Right. You apparently choose to ignore the real issue and assume things in 
order to dismiss this very serious proposal.
 
I really thought that you would see things differently, but apparently 
not. In a few days, AT is two years old and it would have been a great 
"fresh start" to not have any chantards constantly coming there to scream 
and post junk due to "spam" in threads.
 
You think advertising is free on AT? It's not. I was (and still am, but 
not for long) prepared to give you a prominent backlink as well, but you 
seem completely uninterested in this.
 
It would be a simple matter of displaying a small link randomly on every 
Xth page load across the boards. If you don't already have such a system 
in order, which I believe you do, it would be extremely easy to code.
 
The offer still stands, but this really is the last time I'm going to try 
to reason with you. I actually do have better things to do than sending 
fruitless e-mails.
 
(I can make a small custom graphical banner if you want, and you can get a 
(static) image banner as well.)

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-17 8:03

No exceptions

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 20:02

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-22 22:06

>>24
Can
You
Do
This
Without
[o],
``faggot''?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-05 16:38

faggot

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-05 16:47

>>6
Heheheh, you couldn't craft BBCODE without testing it! What a loser!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-05 17:00

>>8
What are you talking about? Also, I know how to do it without [o].

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-05 17:06

>>9
You use [m][u][/m]?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-05 17:11

FUCK THEY DELETED THE HERBAL JEW THREAD

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-05 17:16

>>9
He posted in a dead thread with sage, addressing >>24 chan. He was obviously testing his BBCODE.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-05 17:23

>>11
They deleted that yesterday.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-05 17:29

EW, JEWS!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-05 19:00

>>10
No, there's actually two other [B][B][CODE]s that translate into HTML spans.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-05 19:04

HOT STRIPPING BBCOEDS

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 0:54

python's HTMLParser seems to freak out on some of the kimmo's email links in the op.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 1:09

Hahahaha, wow.
He wanted 4chan to link to his shitty little website in exchange for them stopping the spam? What a joke.
Good thing captchas were implemented

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 1:09

Who's Kimmo Alm? Isn't he that fat German guy who fled to New Zealand?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 1:13

>>19
A guy who made and ran a shitty textboard, then spammed /b/ like crazy with links to it.
No idea if it still exists.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 3:05

>>18
fucker. Go suck your lovely admin's cock. Get the fuck out of here.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 3:23

What the fuck is this? How did you even create this monster shitchan?


<a href="mailto:op.<a href="mailto:tl76l8s88f86cr@kimmoa.bredbandsbolaget">tl76l8s88f86cr@kimmoa.bredbandsbolaget</a>.se&gt">op.<a href="mailto:tl76l8s88f86cr@kimmoa.bredbandsbolaget">tl76l8s88f86cr@kimmoa.bredbandsbolaget</a>.se&gt</a>

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 3:27

http://www.testing"quotes"what"does"this"do".com

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 3:29

>>23
Looks like it's been fixed since >>1 was posted. quotes inside of hyper links were not escaped.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 3:31

except href="mailto...etc wasn't in the op. I'm dumbfounded.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 3:51

ha I remember this guy. His bulletins were priceless.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 4:37

>>21
Hey look, it's the man himself.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 5:17

>>27
If you make one more shallow uneducated ignorant, and ultimately incorrect inference, I'm going to kill you. In a rain of false deductions, I will cut you down.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 5:21

>>28
You're butthurt 4chan captchas can't be cracked, so you can't post your pedoforum spam?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 5:22

>>28
your gay

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 5:30

>>29
I have a few choices. I can leave /prog/ and no longer suffer the pain of exposure to your limitless stupidity and general horribleness. I can spam the board so you filth is pushed past the front page. I can filter your very recognizable key words and encourage others to not respond to your filth. In any case, responding to you only seems to provoke you more. As if it's the only thing you are capable of, posturing and vomiting memes over everything you come across. You are filth. You are nothing. There isn't a bit of benefit to reading anything you write.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 5:36

>>31
>I can spam the board
Thats a great accomplishment, imagine the wisdom required for such a difficult task.
Only the highest intelligence on the planet can spam. 
Have you considered applying for Nobel prize? Or do these committees constitute the filth beneath your feet and even a God can't help but be jealous of your spamming skills?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 5:40

>>32
Thank you, there was some content in this post. Unlike >>29-30. It actually made me think about something for longer than 1 second. Please do this more often. If too much of >>29-30 dominates the board, I'll have no choice but to fill the board with unicode. It would be an improvement, as random streams of foreign characters are more interesting to read.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 5:46

>>33
>i can't be bothered to filter blockquote.textContent.length<30 chars

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 5:49

>>31
Or you could go to that thread on that other board and help me with TEXCODE by checking if there's anything missing or wrong in the specification.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 5:50

>>34
I could but there are two issues with that. One being it would be easier for me to just leave /prog/. Two, >>29-30-idiots might actually say something interesting but encoded in their epic /g/ speak. This has not yet happened and I doubt it ever will, but I don't want to deny them the opportunity of having me as an audience if or when they do.

Name: >>30 2013-08-24 5:57

>>28
I was shitposting ironically.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 6:06

>>37
I had a feeling. Unfortunately >>29 is entirely genuine.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 6:19

>>38
That could very well be. :(

Name: >>31 2013-08-24 6:22

I want to clarify though, my comments don't apply to you personally, but just the manner that you project yourself while using this text board. I don't know your actual identity and can't judge your character, only the projection of it here and the interpretation that I create. All of my distaste with your posts have to do with the lack of interesting content. I don't really mind the rudeness, it's just that I get nothing more past the 3 or 4 insults. You can insult me all you want, but please give me something else at the same time so I can justify the time it takes to read your posts. I hope you understand.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 7:23

>>40
You're welcome to leave any time.
We promise not to miss you!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 7:44

>>40
No, don't leave! If you do I'll miss you!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 10:27

>>42
Yeah, this guy will miss you!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 10:30

>>43
>implying 'this guy' isn't replying to himself

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 10:46

>>44
LLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLL
E/G/IN IMPLYING /G/ROSKI XDDDDDDDDDD
>MFW USING LE IMPLING XDDDDDDD
>IMYPLGIN MY FAVOURATE MAYME ISNT LE IMPLYING FACE XDDDDDDDDDDDD
LEEEEEL DO YOU EVEN IMPLYING /G/RO XDDDDDDD
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 10:53

>>34
Who the fuck are you trying to quote (and failing miserably), /g/ shitstain?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 11:20

>>45
Has your brain been overtaken by retarded tulpa of a "imaginary shitposter"?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 11:21

>>47
No, there's an actual /g/ro shitposter in the premises.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 12:58

>>44
It seems 70% of your posts involve false inferences on the identity of posters. Specifically, the merger of distict poster identities to a single entity. The deductions seem to assume that there cannot be more than one person that shares any single opinion, especially when this opinion presents some sort of conflict for you.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 13:00

>>49
>It seems 70% of your posts involve false inferences on the identity of posters.
>70% of your posts
>your posts

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 13:01

>>50
Those are some silly greater than signs, man!

Why did you place them there? 49 is not greater than 70%.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 13:04

>>51
>le gentleman rusemaster

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 13:05

>>52
Where did you learn such faulty arithmetic? 51 can't be greater than le either, le is a goddamn word!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 13:05

>>50
Forgive me. I am guilty of the same sin. But rather than basing the poster identity unification on opposing opinions, I base them on your inability to write in a coherent manner.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 13:07

>>54
I barely identified >>50-san as someone of terrible math skills. Are you someone with terrible math skills too?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 13:11

>>55
no, but I am

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-24 16:47

Sometimes I miss Kimmo. Sometimes I wish that He'd come back. He is the hero that 4chan deserves, not Captcha. Even the Orange boxes were better chemo than anything anyone has since devised.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List