/prog/ - SICP Progress

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 5:37

How far has everyone gotten with SICP? I'm on the last boss, but I've run out of medikits.

In all seriousness, though. How many of you actually do the exercises? How far have you gotten?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 5:38

Haven't gotten past the first pages -- I was put off by the Scheme syntax :(

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 5:44

I havnt got past the third exercise, i think i am more an artist than a scientist or engineer.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 5:46

>>1-3
back to /pr/, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 5:53

I have read the introduction and made a song about it!

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 6:05

I'm on 1.3.3.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 6:11

I did the first four chapters, and about 90% of the exercises.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 6:36

I read it all. As for exercises, my goal was to do 2/3 of them in every section.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 7:26

I've read none of it and I've done all the exercises.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 7:37

I've received mine yesterday.

Name: 1 2010-08-31 7:49

>>4
I've been here longer than you, shaped more of the culture than you, was in fact the first to notice a distinctly /pr/uney smell about certain posters, so I suggest that it is you who should leave.

I should also mention that I used to do the exercises in my motorcycle book, not that >>4 has been here long enough to get the reference.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 8:21

I'm on 2.1.3
It took me about 2 days to get there. (About 8-10 hours, I did almost all the exercises. I had to google something because DrRacket doesn't have the runtime function)

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 10:19

>>11
Parable pockets.

I'm kidding, I just wanted to say that.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 13:01

>>11
Sorry, if the quality of this shitty thread is anything to go by I have a hard time believing you. You also forgot you're sage.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 13:39

>>14
Forgot you're sage

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 14:05

>>15
Forget it kid, I'm a sage.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 15:34

>>4
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 16:33

>>17
Lead by example.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 17:01

>>18
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 18:30

We worked until about 4.2.2 during our programming course in my first semester at University. We skipped a lot of stuff though.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 21:34

>>19
Lead by example.

Name: sage 2010-08-31 21:45

>>21
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 0:40

>>22
Smooth.

Name: sage 2010-09-01 1:04

>>22
Lead by example.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 1:33

>>24
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 2:17

>>25
Lead by example.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 4:16

>>26
Exemplify your leadership.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 4:27

>>27
Will do once >>25 exemplifies his.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 5:18

>>26,28
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 5:46

You guys destroyed what could have been a nice thread. Shame on you!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 5:57

Am I the only who don't care where people are from or how their programming is as long as they don't act like dicks?

Name: >>1 2010-09-01 7:56

This was hilarious, but now we need to stop posting.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 9:58

>>31
Perhaps you should be at stackoverflow, then.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 16:25

>>33
Fuck shatoverflow.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 21:35

>>31
I certainly hope so. Attaching more importance to tone than to substance has destroyed so many potentially interesting communities over the years, I would hate to see that bullshit making it to /prog/ as well.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:26

I can't quite get fibs. Can anyone give me some examples of fibs?

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:28

>>36
fibs = 0 : 1 : zipWith (+) fibs (tail fibs)

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:38

i love sicp. i have read it 5 times

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:40

>>37
f@(_:fs) = [0,1] ++ zipWith (+) f fs

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:54

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=6ZOPQTP0
Why not in English?
Who can read?

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:56

Where is that fibs done in terms of loeb?

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 13:36

>>41
http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1229802387/119

loeb f = fmap ($ loeb f) f

fibs = loeb $ map const [0,1]++[\x -> x!!a + tail x!!a | a <- [0..]]

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 15:22

An endless succession of fibs.

(define fibs (stream-cons 1 (stream-cons 1 (stream-map + fibs (stream-cdr fibs)))))

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 20:50

>>43
I hope that's an even stream you're using bub (not that it matters for fibs).

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 21:27

>>44
(require srfi/41)
fuck yeah

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-04 12:22

"computer scientist" who read SICP and love lisp is gomocecuaist

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-04 12:36

>>41-42
here's a better one:
fibs = loeb $ 0 : 1 : map (flip (!!) + (flip (!!) . succ)) [0..]

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-04 12:43

gomocecuaist
This thread is the only one on google for that search term

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-04 12:57

>>48
No, it's a different thread. With a whole 4 different posters!

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-05 0:48

>>48
Hopefully it will help such people brush up on their fibs skills.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-05 5:50

>>49
Who's the fourth poster?

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-05 8:11

I have implemented an enterprise quality #fibs.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 13:20

check 'em

SICP Progress

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 5:37

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 5:38

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 5:44

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 5:46

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 5:53

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 6:05

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 6:11

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 6:36

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 7:26

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 7:37

11 Name: 1 2010-08-31 7:49

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 8:21

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 10:19

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 13:01

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 13:39

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 14:05

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 15:34

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 16:33

19 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 17:01

20 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 18:30

21 Name: Anonymous 2010-08-31 21:34

22 Name: sage 2010-08-31 21:45

23 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 0:40

24 Name: sage 2010-09-01 1:04

25 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 1:33

26 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 2:17

27 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 4:16

28 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 4:27

29 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 5:18

30 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 5:46

31 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 5:57

32 Name: >>1 2010-09-01 7:56

33 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 9:58

34 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 16:25

35 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-01 21:35

36 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:26

37 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:28

38 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:38

39 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:40

40 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:54

41 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 12:56

42 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 13:36

43 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 15:22

44 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 20:50

45 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-02 21:27

46 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-04 12:22

47 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-04 12:36

48 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-04 12:43

49 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-04 12:57

50 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-05 0:48

51 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-05 5:50

52 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-05 8:11

54 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 14:35

55 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 13:20