What >>4 said, however experienced Lisp programmers would now all the standard special operators, functions and macros anyway, and newbies can use the implementation/environment to easily find out everything there is to know about any symbol, so they'd easily find out where it came from and what it's supposed to do.
90% of CS students learn a functional programming language
10% of those CS students end up making useful programs with a functional programming language
the other 80% of those CS students never use the functional programming language they learned other than to tell people they know how to program in this language to earn leetness cred
Name:
Anonymous2010-08-24 15:44
>>24
That would be 10% of the total CS students, not 10% of the ones who learnt a functional programming language.
You can't criticizes LISP! YOU WILL REGRET THIS!!!
Name:
Anonymous2010-08-24 17:00
I may probably write a Lisp that removes the notion of cons cells and atoms, instead representing sexps as binary trees.
TELL ME HOW THIS COULD GO WRONG