Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Assembler and tutorial

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 3:29

Can anyone link me to a good assembler and tutorial for Asm. I've tried Google but all I'm finding is broken links and DOS programs.
I'm using a 64 bit processor and am already familiar with programming in general.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 16:27

>>36,39
Punish me how, oh Mr. Shitposter?
Here's a tip: go fuck yourself in the ass with blunt object until you bleed out.

Name: /prog/ Etiquette Advisor !fzcXE63Op. 2010-08-24 16:34

>>41
Please sage when shitposting.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 16:35

>>42
How about, no? Does "no" work for you? It sure works for me.

Name: /prog/ Etiquette Advisor !fzcXE63Op. 2010-08-24 16:35

>>40
You must create your own, and police the board.

The position of /prog/ Immigration Officer is available.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 16:36

>>44
You are more like /prog/'s newest resident asshole. You don't belong here. Split, noob.

Name: /prog/ Etiquette Advisor !fzcXE63Op. 2010-08-24 16:38

>>43
If you require help migrating from /b/, I suggest you return there, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 16:40

>>46
Your ignorance of BBCode betrays you. It is actually you that needs to return forthwith.

Name: /prog/ Etiquette Advisor !fzcXE63Op. 2010-08-24 16:41

>>47
Please sage when shitposting.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 16:41

Further if you were on of the denizens of this board you would know the proper use of sage.

Name: /prog/ Etiquette Advisor !fzcXE63Op. 2010-08-24 16:44

>>49
If you are shitposting on a thread on the front page, you do not need to age the thread.

Please sage when shitposting.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 16:53

>>50

Name: /prog/ Etiquette Advisor !fzcXE63Op. 2010-08-24 16:57

>>51
Please sage when shitposting.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 17:38

>>52
no

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 18:28

>>6

This is actually not a very good idea.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 18:38

>>37
>>37
Do you have the full course for free? This is very good stuff, but I dont feel like spending 100$ on it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 18:43

>>52
Please stop shitposing

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 19:37

Bump because >>52 is a faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 22:26

>>1
Assembler: NASM
Tutorial: Search for Paul A. Carter's

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-24 22:49

>>37
x86 assembly considered complicated? You gotta be kidding me.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 1:26

For hating the imageboards so much you guys sure have the exact same tendency to repeatedly respond to shitposts instead of ignoring them.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 4:41

>>60
Have you ever considered that the people who respond to the shitposts are not the same people who complain about the imageboards?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 4:55

>>61
No.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 5:53

>>61
Now ask yourself, which group is more annoying?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 7:56

>>63
The people responding to shitposts. I know you're trying to make a point, but you're wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 8:07

>>64
The thing is, when complaining, you're still not contributing decent content to this board, which is essentially shitposting.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 8:14

>>64
You don't understand /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 8:44

>>65
Not all metaposting is automatically shitposting. When you understand this, maybe you'll understand why you keep getting told to go away.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 8:55

>>67
It is when your “metaposts” are ``go back to /foo/'', ``I remember when /anus/ was good'' and similar sentiments.

>>65 was my first post in this vein of this thread. Please don't assume that I am any worse than you, I'm just trying to make more sense than the lesser-abled on their behalf.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 9:23

>>68
It is when your “metaposts” are ``go back to /foo/''
I disagree. We're constantly awash in imageboard effluent; if we don't take an active part in defending our culture, we will lose it and become /g/ without images. It happened to /comp/ and /tech/, and was happening to /sci/ before /sci/ came along.
I will agree that there are better ways conceivable, but those aren't always feasible.

I think everyone can at least agree that the ``Fuck off, ``faggot'''' idiot and his latest cry for attention, that etiquette advisor thing, is more obnoxious than the ``back to /somewhere/'' people ever were.

Name: /prog/ Etiquette Advisor !fzcXE63Op. 2010-08-25 11:04

>>69
I am not the ``Fuck off, ``faggot'''' guy. I am the guy who emailed the Sussman, wrote the BUFFA program and I am poking fun at you all (And therefore myself).

Please sage when shitposting.

Name: Fuck off, !Ep8pui8Vw2 2010-08-25 12:39

>>69-70
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 12:41

>>71
What have we come to, when every 2 bit Nigger has a tripcode?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 12:46

>>72
*African American

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 13:14

>>39
way to shit up the thread. look if you took out all your posts, and all the posts replying to yours, we would have a decent thread about OP's question with the first two initial troll statements.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 14:15

>>73
* Afro-European

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 14:35

>>75
* Arab-Eurasian

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 14:38

>>76
*Indo-European

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 14:44

>>75,77
It's Europeon, you idiots.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-25 16:58

>>78
No, Your a pean.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-27 2:30

>>1
"ASM" isn't really an assembly structure of any sort, so I don't think your question is really understood.

You're asking a general question about writing a machine-level program, for... which processor architecture?
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -