>>14
Of course you know it's a man when it's kigurumi porn; regular kigurumi pics might be ambiguous, but not porn. It wouldn't be porn if you didn't see genitals.
>>15 It wouldn't be porn if you didn't see genitals.
If that's your definition of pornography (and I dispute that), then you are right if and only if, it is all male. Otherwise any male on female action would have to be considered 'gay'.
>>23
Just out of frame, the buff, shiny-headed "bread" men are staring lovingly into each others' eyes. The female "ham" in this "sandwich" receives no attention while her vaginal "butter" juices and anal "mustard" bleeding serve as lubrication between the wholemæles for both their relationship and penile pleasure.