Name:
!DVBzFp5jB6
2010-08-14 18:53
Hey, I'll keep this nice and short and simple.
I would like to find an x86 assembly instruction reference.
The closest I could find was:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_instruction_listings
Though it is terribly incomplete.
Help?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-14 19:13
>>6
WELCOME TO /prog/
Please try to sage your posts
!
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-14 19:17
Intel's documentation is quite superb. It's a pleasure to read on a boring Saturday afternoon.
Name:
!DVBzFp5jB6
2010-08-14 19:30
Ok, another question; whats the most efficient linker on windows. MinGW's ld is pretty shitty.
ALINK is bullshit.
VS LINK is also shit.
Name:
!DVBzFp5jB6
2010-08-14 19:55
I mean a linker to produce PE\Win32 executables from obj files.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-14 20:02
Your using the wrong o/s.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-14 21:27
Fuck off already, OP. We don't want you here.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-14 21:52
>>20
Same to you. Can we not have programming threads on a programming board? Asshole. (And your use of "OP" is pig disgusting.)
>>1
Try
http://ref.x86asm.net/coder32-abc.html and related links.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-15 3:28
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-15 15:16
bump for highest efficiency linker
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-15 15:18
>>26
I'm curious, why do you care so much about linker efficiency?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-15 15:43
>>27
He's the kind of person that'd think GNU's linker needs a rewrite. *shurgs*
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-15 18:03
>>24
http://siyobik.info/index.php?module=x86
Why does he wrap a table in <object> tags? Why should I trust such a person to provide adequate information on any subject?
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-15 20:16
>>28
It does, in order to support LTO properly.
Name:
Anonymous
2010-08-15 20:27
>>31
It does for lots of reasons. Speed of execution is on the very bottom of that list, if at all.