Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

To Sage or not To Sage

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 17:09

I think we can all agree that a post should only bump a thread if it is meaningful enough to warrant the top spot on the thread list. However, it shouldn't be up to the poster, or any /prog/ USER whether or not a post is meaningful. It should be decided by /prog/ itself.

Self-bumping as a choice only encourages shit posters to use sage as a conveyance of their disapproval and nothing more. Not to mention the countless missuses of bumping and sage by competent programmers.

I suggest all posts be sages by default and the /prog/ servers be updated to include functionality that supports autobumping good threads when they need it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 17:11

So, people wouldn't be able to bump threads at all?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 17:11

>>2
Correct.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 17:15

>>3

[spoiler]
IndeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEE!  The torch is going out!!! [/spoiler

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 17:16

>>4

I is a noob

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 17:31

>>1
I suggest all posts be sages by default
That's the only good thing in your post, but it more than makes up for all the other bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 17:38

servers be updated to include functionality that supports autobumping

Ok! Lets see your code OP.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 18:12

/prog/ servers be updated to periodically ruin good threads
fixed that for you. I suspect that OP is a new poster, otherwise he would have noticed that pattern by now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-04 21:51

Are you all the same person? You are, aren't you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-05 0:49

>>9
there are actually three of us.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-05 1:27

>>9
SPAWHBTC
Also, fuck OP's bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-05 16:57

Threads should only be bumped when information is presented that is important, and it is vital that it is distributed to everyone.  Starting a new thread might be a better idea.

Name: noko 2011-01-19 15:19

sage

Name: dr racket 2011-01-19 15:53

>>12
this

also op is dreaming when he thinks 4chan's boards software is going to be changed just for /prog/.

Name: Doctor Racket 2011-01-19 16:24

>>12
It's a tumor.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-19 18:22

i always sage

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-19 18:59

sageru

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-19 19:08

sageru ageru yo~

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-19 19:47

>>1
OP, I'll never bump a thread again if a kind javascript friend makes me a script that places sage in the email field. It would also be nice if he made one for the imageboards. I'm just getting started with javascript so I could use an example.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-19 19:53

>>18
下げる セックス

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-20 10:41

>>19
// ==UserScript==
// @name           Expert poster mode
// @description    Blue nickname for VIPPERs only
// @namespace      http://dis.4chan.org/prog/
// @include        http://dis.4chan.org/*;
// @include        http://boards.4chan.org/*;
// @version        1.0
// ==/UserScript==

(function() {
    // dis.4chan.org
    var mailfields = document.querySelectorAll('.postform input[name="meiru"]');
    // boards.4chan.org
    if (mailfields.length == 0)
        mailfields = document.querySelectorAll('input.inputtext[name="email"]');

    for (var i = 0; i < mailfields.length; ++i)
        mailfields.item(i).value = 'sage';
})();

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 18:33

>>21
It doesn't work.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 19:03

>>21

Sorry to be a n00b but, how do I use that? ;;

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 20:03

main :: IO ()
main = mapM_ putChar $ cycle "<3 "

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-22 20:14

>>24
why don't you go fuck a dead dog?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-12 9:21

yes

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List