>>21
Except I don't understand what you're saying. Your assertions make vague references and fail to point out specific examples that will reasonably support your argument.
Nice newspeak figure. Your legalese is built to be confusing and open to interpretation, and you know it.
Now that you've asserted my response as newspeak, would mind explaining in further detail? Or is this just a red herring argument? Would you mind pointing out how the GPL legalese is worded to actually prevent the premises pointed out in
>>20?