Creative Commons licenses

is it better or worse than GPL? or is something like BSD license should be used instead?

All the legalese exists for people who are confused by these premises.

Nice newspeak figure. Your legalese is built to be confusing and open to interpretation, and you know it.

How about stating that your GPL (General Privation License^[1]) requires anyone who use the source to release all his source online and license it under the GPL (General Privation License)? It would be more intellectually honest than trying to co-opt virally those of us who want to only share code, and not your anarcho-socialist agenda.


[1]: It is very important to rename any concept you dislike in the FSF (Foolish Silly Freetard) lifestyle - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html