/prog/ - On the Anic google group:

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:04

I found this on the anic google group discussion page, by a man named "phallus99":

"Just to be frank, the stuff you are trying to claim is full of bull
shit. And really, I'm just tired of it. I keep hearing people at my
college talk about this "new", "amazing" language which is honestly
probably the worst language I have ever seen. It is not intuitive, and
all of you are fooling yourselves.
Faster than C?
Okay that statement pisses me off so fucking much that I will just
respond with this:

NO YOU ARE GOD DAMNED RETARDED DIDN'T YOU TAKE COMP SCI I??!!!'

That is all."

What is this guy's problem? I mean seriously, does he get off be annoying or something?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:08

His problem is that he is right and everyone else is wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:09

>>2
How the hell is he right?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:09

BREAKING NEWS: Most of the people on the internet couldn't find their own assholes with a hand mirror and a goddamn map. Also, programmers disagree about the merits of programming languages. Film at 11.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:10

>>2
If everyone else is wrong, wouldn't it be their problem?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:11

>>5
That says nothing.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:12

http://code.google.com/p/anic/wiki/Tutorial

I'm a little worried about the language as it seems to encourage sloppy coding with it's philosophy ("write and forget" or something like that).

The code will get unreadable really soon if you're not careful. At least this will be fast, unlike Perl.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:15

>>7
Is that a joke?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:16

>>8
It is what you want it to be honey.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:41

Oh my, that's probably the ugliest code I've ever seen

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-30 4:14

>>1
yeah that language is called ASM.
no wait ...

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-30 8:31

>>5
Quite the opposite. The Roman Catholics were wrong about the Earth being the centre of the universe, and they still, to this day, have no problems at all.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-30 12:07

>>9
Was ``fast'' referring to execution speed or the time period in which something becomes unreadable?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 2:26

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 11:26

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:40

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

On the Anic google group:

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:04

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:08

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:09

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:09

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:10

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:11

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:12

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:15

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:16

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:41

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-30 4:14

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-30 8:31

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-30 12:07

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 2:26

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 11:26

19 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:40

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:04

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:08

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:09

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:09

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:10

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 19:11

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:12

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:15

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:16

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-29 21:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-30 4:14

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-30 8:31

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-30 12:07

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 2:26

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 11:26

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:40