/prog/riders by OS
1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 21:56
Windows users : 10%
Linux users : 90%
Mac users : 0%
2
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 21:57
There aren't even that many people here. Unless you mena dual-booting.
3
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 21:57
You forgot Plan 9 and Hurd
4
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 22:01
When did we get windows users? Disgusting.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 22:03
>>1
Taro's BSD is underrepresented
6
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 22:04
7
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 22:06
>>5
You can run the Anonix toolkit on BSD, LINUX, Solaris, or almost any kernel you like. It's so flexible!
8
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 22:08
>>6
Isn't Anonix just a poorly conceived Linux/BSD/whatever distribution/derivative? I
don't give a shit but am not sure which of ('yes', 'no') would be a sadder answer.
9
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 22:08
>>1
I use MacOS and Windows, which proves your statistics wrong.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 22:10
>>8
Imagine a third of GNU coreutils reimplemented by imageboard ``hackers''.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 22:17
>>8, >>10 is right.
It's just a copy of
ls with a rambly faux license
It's a shame it no longer exists, for humour purposes
12
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 22:20
>>1
UMH Memesmith uses a Mac.
13
Name:
Itchy
2010-07-28 22:24
>>12
3/10. Two strikes against you:
1. That guy's not UMH memesmith.
2. Didn't he kill himself anyway? Only the living count as
/prog/ lodytes.
Other than that, nice try. I almost raged a little.
14
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 22:26
>>10
Okay. That is on par with what I was imagining.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 23:15
>>13
What? Who said who was UHM Memesmith?
16
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 23:32
>>11
1.
ls is in the two thirds of GNU coreutils that Anonix doesn't have.
2. The code (
http://rechan.eu.org/misc/ ) and boards (
http://rechan.eu.org/ac/ ,
http://rechan.eu.org/ax/ ) still exist. Go forth and troll GNU if you feel like it.
17
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 23:35
>>9
That's just pathetic.
18
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 23:37
>>16
1. Seriously? Lol. They's lazy.
2. That's a little sad. I was happier when I thought it was given up on, because I pitied them less.
Addendum; I dislike that they use the
/prog/ snake in their kitschy faux-letterhead
19
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-28 23:51
1. Seriously? Lol. They's lazy.
Their excuse was that they couldn't figure out how to do implement this part of POSIX:
The ls utility shall detect infinite loops; that is, entering a previously visited directory that is an ancestor of the last file encountered. When it detects an infinite loop, ls shall write a diagnostic message to standard error and shall either recover its position in the hierarchy or terminate.
20
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 0:02
>>19
Really? Did
Cudder and
HAHAHaruhi even pretend to know what they were doing?
21
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 0:07
>>19
Their excuse was that they couldn't figure out how to do implement this part of POSIX:
Oh come on.
22
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 0:34
Erika and
Taro both use FreeBSD, and
Erika and
Xarn both use Plan 9. Please include this in your statistics,
>>1 -chan.
23
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 0:52
24
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 2:11
I use FreeBSD for the /usr/ports
25
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 3:11
>>22
Xarn also uses FreeBSD.
26
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 8:36
>>19
I would've cheated and read the GNU version. Why didn't they do that?
They have an example of at least
one way to solve a problem, but they're not even clever enough to look at the method and reimplement it?
>>23
Perhaps dead to
you , sir. But I've realized that there are months of terrible backposts to be had
27
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 9:11
Xarn
28
Name:
Xarn
2010-07-29 9:11
Xarn
29
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 9:38
UPDATED STATISTICS
OS:
Windows users: 2
Linux users: 10
Mac users: 2
Free BSD: 5
Plan 9: 2
GNU/T urd: 0
Coreutils:
GNU: 20
Anon: 1
I doubt that many people post here, considering it's just me, the Sussman and Xarn
30
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 9:55
I use just about anything except for OS X.
Primary OS is usually Windows XP, and a bunch of VMs (Debian, Ubuntu, Win 9x, Win 7, others).
31
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 10:04
>>29
I use both GNU and Linux. I am the person here who claims to be the Hurd hacker.
32
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 10:06
Linux kernel is a buggy piece of shit. I use XP.
33
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 10:19
I use House.
34
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 10:23
I quadruple-boot Win XP and three Linuces.
35
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 11:17
I use an OS I wrote my self in Visual Basics.
36
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 11:54
>>35
How many selves did you write and how many VBs did you use?
37
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 13:20
38
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 14:17
Linux/BSD/Solaris/Mac for work
Linux/Mac for home
Add that to your statistics genius.
39
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 14:41
40
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 14:49
41
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 15:01
>>36
That question actually makes sense as written.
42
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 16:04
I use XP to play simgolf and well, that's it.
I can't program for shit.
43
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-29 18:18
I sextuple boot XP, FreeDOS, OpenBSD, Gentoo, and two different flavors of anus. I brush my teeth with Macintosh afterwards.
44
Name:
Richard
2010-07-29 21:47
>>29
I find that GNU/Linux is grossly underrepresented
45
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-30 0:49
>>43
Surreal shit like your post is what this place
always needed more of.
Good job, madam. On your watch,
/prog/ has become
fi hea lthy again.
46
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-30 1:07
47
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-30 1:31
>>45
Excellent BBCode
8 /
10
48
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-30 3:50
In case anyone is wondering, POSIX means p iece o f s hit *nix
49
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-30 4:52
>>48
Sure it does,
Cudder .
50
Name:
Anonymous
2010-11-13 19:05