Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

:O

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 16:43

You now realize that "C++" has two pluses because they didn't want to only add one and have people confuse it with the grade "C+".

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 16:49

You now realise that Bjornie Stripstrap didn't grow up in a country that has letter grades.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 16:50

You now realise C+ isn't a valid C expression.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 16:51

>>1
You now realize that [x]
Back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 16:53

Apparently Bjarne failed to realize that you can't increment a constant.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 17:09

I now realize that "C+" was the grade I got in my "C++" class...

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 17:17

>>5
looks more like a var to me.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 17:20

>>7
In C, capital letters are for constants.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 17:20

++C would be more appropriate, no?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 17:24

>>9
No, a postincrement more correctly reflects what actually happened. Bjarne copied C, and then C got better while Sepples didn't.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 17:24

>>9
No, it's actually quite accurate. You see, it stayed the same, while C got better.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 17:34

>>10-11
The canonical joke is that it incremented C and returned the old value. That joke is not about C getting better.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 17:54

>>12
But C does get better if the joke is to respect its own canon.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 19:23

Stop making canon jokes.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 20:44

Canon 2006, the hit series from Kyoto Automation. Available in all leading and following retail outlets now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 20:58

Do not use the name of Pachelbel's works in vain.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-27 22:28

>>12
That quite clever.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-28 2:12

>>17
Your sentence no verb?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-28 9:08

>>18
*You're

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-28 11:40

>>19
*Yore

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-28 13:59

>>20
*Yaw

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-28 14:18

>>21
*Yo dawg

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-28 14:34

>>17
I wonder if I could go a day speaking like this.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-28 15:52

>>3
To bad its a valid S expression. bitch!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-28 16:06

>>24
If only S-expressions could be compiled into their C equivalents.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-26 3:52

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-06 9:37

Back to /b/, ``GNAA Faggot''

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List