Readable C++

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significantly_Prettier_and_Easier_C%2B%2B_Syntax

A polished turd is still a turd. It's better, but it was hard to make worse.

“Make it look like Haskell, we will! Be lauded, we will!”

>>1
I nominate this article for deletion.

For the record, I actually implemented it, and the proposed syntax didn't actually work. :( This was about three years ago, so I don't remember the exact problems, but I believe it was that they didn't handle any of the interesting corner cases where expressions are used as template parameters. I ended up having to make some major modifications to make it work (but was able to start porting sections of my C++ library to it before deciding the idea wasn't actually very useful. --Jay Freeman (saurik) (talk) 14:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

So how did he actually implement this SPECs idea of his?

Did he just like code an utility to reformat to actual Cplusplus syntax or did he build a compiler of his own?!

>>6
>start porting sections of my C++ library