Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

JPEG Editor

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-23 18:34

I am making some sprites for a game I'm developing. I've been using Paint so far to create the images, however I'm finding that sometimes paint decides to 'compress' the image while I'm working with it, causing artifacting. I need the images in JPEG format, and I need the pixels to stay at PRECISELY the values I set for them.

What JPEG editor should I use?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-23 18:38

Are you FV?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-23 18:41

>>1
I can't tell if it's a troll or not.
JPEG is a lossy format, so you get what you get.  Use TGA or PNG or something lossless if you really need exact pixels.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-23 18:41

>>2
no

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-23 20:18

>>1
JPEG needs to be re-encoded every time you save. Not technically, some affine transforms can be done without a need to re-encode but I have yet to find any software that will actually bother checking for this

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-23 22:33

>>1
Why do you need them in .jpg format?
The question may be pretty much unanswerable with that stipulation

Just re-edit whatever code you'are apparently stealing to use png or gif or some shit

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-23 23:07

>>5
Limiting the recompression to macroblocks is possible. I believe there was some editor around supporting this (recompress only changed macroblocks!), however editing jpg's is gay in itself. Use real lossless formats OP.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 1:42

if you really need a jpeg, you should keep it in a lossless format like png for editing, and convert it to jpeg once when you're done. never open the jpeg for editing. never convert from jpeg to png.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 9:03

Lossless JPEG

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 11:18

Use the GIMP. It's free (as in freedom)

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 11:24

>>10
Use Pinta. It's really free instead of that fake GNU "free" shit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 11:26

>>9
Doesn't actually exist.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 11:31

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 11:49

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 12:58

>>13
It's cute how ``lossless JPEG'' is actually either not lossless or not JPEG.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-24 13:25

>>11
Yeah, sure, Mono. Free.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-31 19:54

While lossless JPEG standard exists, almost no software actually supports it.

The re-compression-avoiding image editor is called RealWorld Photos.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 0:01

>>17
Learn to sage or go back to /b/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 1:01

>>18
I'm tired of being repressed.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 1:05

>>18
His(>>17) bump was legit. The thread hasn't been bumped in 5 days, was way off the front page and he had something useful to bring to our attention. However, >>19 is most certainly not a legit bump, and he should be ashamed of himself for it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 2:06

>>20
Spam is not useful. The fact that the thread hadn't been bumped in 5 days and was way off the front page makes his spam-bump even more obnoxious.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 3:22

OP here, I was just trolling. I made up the whole thing :\

I kind of feel bad about it now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 10:17

>>22
You could at least sage, you twat.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 15:02

>>23
I actually have a physical inability to sage. Are you discriminating against me based on my handicap?

Name: VIPPER 2010-08-01 15:20

VIPPER?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-01 15:27

>>25
I feel you are posting on the wrong board, my VIPPERnd.

Name: VIPPER 2010-08-01 15:58

JEWS

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-15 22:53


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List