Return
Styles:
Pseud0ch
,
Terminal
,
Valhalla
,
NES
,
Geocities
,
Blue Moon
.
Pages:
1-
Test
1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 13:49
int x=2;//You should be able to solve this without resorting to a compiler.
x+=(x++ + ~x++ * x++ +~x + ++x);//What is x now?
2
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 13:57
implementation specific
3
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 13:58
2
4
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 14:21
What
>>2
said.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 14:47
A daemon just flew out from my nose.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 16:10
over 9000
7
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 16:13
But I don't want to auto-increment!
8
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 16:18
>>6
back to /b/, please
9
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 16:56
>>1
x might not even exist anymore. undefined behavior means the compiler can do
anything
and still comply with the standard.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 16:57
>>2-9
From when were you under the impression that
>>1
was talking about C?
11
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 16:58
>>9
Anything, like run emacs?
12
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 17:04
>>10
in sepples you
13
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 17:49
>>11
Undefined behaviour is usually dangerous, so yes,
especially run emacs
14
Name:
>>13
2010-07-22 17:49
forgot mah sage
15
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 18:08
>>1
VALID BRAINFUCK CODE
16
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-22 19:48
>>11
You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different
17
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-09 1:29
18
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-02 23:00
19
Name:
Anonymous
2013-01-18 23:52
/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Don't change these.
Name:
Email:
Entire Thread
Thread List