Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Test

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 13:49

int x=2;//You should be able to solve this without resorting to a compiler.
 x+=(x++ + ~x++ * x++ +~x + ++x);//What is x now?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 13:57

implementation specific

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 13:58

2

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 14:21

What >>2 said.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 14:47

A daemon just flew out from my nose.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:10

over 9000

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:13

But I don't want to auto-increment!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:18

>>6
back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:56

>>1
x might not even exist anymore. undefined behavior means the compiler can do anything and still comply with the standard.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:57

>>2-9
From when were you under the impression that >>1 was talking about C?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:58

>>9
Anything, like run emacs?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 17:04

>>10
in sepples you

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 17:49

>>11
Undefined behaviour is usually dangerous, so yes, especially run emacs

Name: >>13 2010-07-22 17:49

forgot mah sage

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 18:08

>>1
VALID BRAINFUCK CODE

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 19:48

>>11
You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-09 1:29

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 23:00

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 23:52

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List