/prog/ - Jisp language

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:32

http://www.ducklet.com/jisp/

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:35

jew lisp?

Name: VIPPER 2010-07-21 15:44

JEWS?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:47

JavaScript is a superset of Lisp(eval/apply/JSON), Haskell(map/reduce/function chaining/closures) and C++(objects/prototypes/getters/setters).

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:49

>>4
I don't think you understand what superset means.

Lern2touringcomplete

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:50

>>4
Too bad it takes 400MB of ram to emulate any of them.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 16:00

Amateurs
http://common-lisp.net/project/parenscript/

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 22:09

>>7
terrible

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 23:45

JavaScript does not have "First-class functions"
function prefix is mandatory and all functions are objects.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 0:03

>>9
saying that javascript doesn't have first-class functions is like saying that LISP doesn't have first-class integers.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 1:43

>>4

Don't you mean Lisp(eval/apply/JSON/map/reduce/function chaining/closures)?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 2:20

>>10
Correct. He must be one of those Scheme weenies which equate first-class with single namespace, while the rest of us love our multiple namespaces and use the term first-class to denote something being an object supported by the language which can be created, passed around as you wish and used as specified (without any artificial limitations).

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 3:09

>>12
functions aren't in a separate namespace in javascript...

function f() { alert('f was called!'); }

var f = 0;

f(); // error

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 3:52

can Lisp execute random code objects from multiple net hosts and call its own functions to download even more code?
Example:
eval(ajaxGet(somehost).JSONObject+ajaxGet(somehost2).JSONObject)

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 6:15

>>14
I'm sure there plenty of programs that do that in many languages.
We call them trojans.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 6:43

Greenspan's 10th rule.

Name: HAXXUS THE OLD FUCK 2010-07-22 12:13

>>12
(without any artificial limitations).
LISTEN HERE JERKFACE

Your first-class object is an artificial construct built upon assembly. That assembly is artificial in it's own way. Everything down to the arrangement of doped silicon is artificial. The limitations are real. You're being disrespectful to the work of thousands of people who worked hard so that you can forget that and act like a smug LISP weenie.

It's similar to a thread I saw on /g/ discussing LHCs first power-up.
Silly physicists should work on real superconductors which could carry infinite current.

Now get off my lawn.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 13:14

>>12
What a stupid assertion, I've never yet met a programmer (Scheme or otherwise) who equated single namespace with first class objects.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:10

>>17
Agreed. That's why I say that computer ``science'' is the meanest and silliest of all fields. It builds upon the hard work of many and gives no credit, just so a few fags can feel like they're walking on clouds.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:13

>>19 is a faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:15

>>20
Incorrect usage of the `faggot'' in italics meme.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:17

>>20
LITHP weenie detected.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:17

>>21
Incorrect usage of ``faggot quotes''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:22

>>23
Yeah, well, that's, like, your opinion, ,faggot'.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-06 9:08

^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^Ba}c}k}}t}o}}/}b}/},}}`}`}G}N}A}A}}F}a}g}g}o}t}'}'}

Jisp language

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:32

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:35

3 Name: VIPPER 2010-07-21 15:44

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:47

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:49

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:50

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 16:00

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 22:09

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 23:45

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 0:03

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 1:43

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 2:20

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 3:09

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 3:52

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 6:15

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 6:43

17 Name: HAXXUS THE OLD FUCK 2010-07-22 12:13

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 13:14

19 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:10

20 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:13

21 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:15

22 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:17

23 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:17

24 Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:22

27 Name: Anonymous 2010-12-06 9:08

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:32

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:35

Name: VIPPER 2010-07-21 15:44

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:47

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:49

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:50

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 16:00

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 22:09

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-21 23:45

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 0:03

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 1:43

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 2:20

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 3:09

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 3:52

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 6:15

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 6:43

Name: HAXXUS THE OLD FUCK 2010-07-22 12:13

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 13:14

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:10

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:13

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:15

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:17

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:17

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-22 16:22

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-06 9:08