HURR DURR HURR C
1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-20 17:58
wav_handler.c:13: note: expected ‘struct FILE_INFO *’ but argument is of type ‘struct FILE_INFO *’
2
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-20 18:09
wav_hander.c
3
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-20 18:10
Perhaps you should accidentally go back to /b/, please
4
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-20 18:15
who said anything about reinventing the wheel? i'm just teaching myself stuff.
5
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-20 18:34
>>4
You aren't teaching yourself much.
This is the most inane thing you could want to implement yourself.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-20 19:00
>>1
I once got a C++ compile error that told me that a function expected a parameter of type Character when I had given it a parameter of type Character.
7
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-20 19:01
>>3
Fuck off,
``faggot'' .
8
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-20 19:08
>>5
maybe you should just go back to writing enterprise-grade pisslets
>>6
how did you fix it? this has been pissing me off to no end.
9
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-20 19:13
>>8
maybe you should just go back to
[m] /b/ [/b] .
10
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-20 19:27
>>9
maybe you should just go back to
BBCODE FAIL
11
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-20 20:12
>>10
[q]maybe you should just go back to BBCODE FAIL[/q]
Major fail.
12
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-20 21:28
You have to post the code.
13
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-20 23:41
>>6
I didn't; I found another route to get to the same solution.
14
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-21 0:22
Back to the imageboards.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-21 2:38
Fuck off, ``faggot'' .
16
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-21 9:33
>>1,6,8,13
The error has to do with variable modifiers such as
const.
17
Name:
Anonymous
2010-07-21 10:04
>>16
But wouldn't an error statement say as much?
18
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-21 10:33
>>17
Between Stallman's compiler and some random
/prog/ asshole implicitly criticizing my existence with his advice, I'd go with the latter
19
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-21 10:34
>>17
Only if you copy and paste the entire thing.
20
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-21 14:24
`Clang' is an ancient African word meaning ``Readable error messages.''
21
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-21 14:50
>>20
It's a misnomer then. C++ forbids readable compiler messages of any kind.
22
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-21 15:52
>>21
That shouldn't pose a problem, at it doesn't really compile much C++ yet.
23
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-21 16:58
>>17
Shouldn't be able to get the error message at all with C, since it's typically found in template code. References can also fuck with this, but that's another Sepples construct. You are using C, right,
>>1 -san?
24
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-21 17:09
I've gotten this with both C and C++.
25
Name:
Anonymous 2010-07-21 21:31
what
28
Name:
Anonymous 2011-11-24 10:03
MY ANUS
29
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-25 14:32
30
Name:
Anonymous
2012-11-27 2:07
Show us the code!
31
Name:
Anonymous 2012-11-27 8:43
Let's necro a 2 year old thread!