Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

So how many of you are enterprise developers?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 9:35

I'm a /prog/rider who's been doing actual ENTERPRISE development for about a year.

Stuff I realize now:

* The main incentive for properly separating application layers and making sure your code doesn't have anything hard coded in it isn't really robustness, flexibility, scalability, etc. It's protecting yourself from stupid clients. Clients have a hard time explaining themselves, and they often don't know what they really want or need. They might change their minds at the last moment, or believe that some change they forgot to mention is "tiny". Enterprise-grade software is client-proof software.

* Enterprise software must be practical, not smart. Sometimes the client will love you for creating a butt-ugly UI that allows him to shove all the data in a single window, and disdain you for building something that is usable, pretty, and elegant.

* The greatest danger an enterprise developer might face is maintaining old code. All efforts should be made to write code that's easy to maintain. This has a very sad consequence: you have to dumb it down. Nobody knows functional programming; avoid lambda expressions, lists, filter, map, reduce. Keep it simple. You don't have to comment fucking everything, but at least give a general idea of WTF you're doing in complex pieces and give your variables and methods names that make sense. Verbosity goes together with algorithmical complexity: if you're writing something simple, write concise code; if you're writing something intricate, make it verbose. Forget language-specific tricks.

* Don't write anything serious right before your vacation.

* Always write a document describing the general architecture of your software. Stick to it. Don't be a dickhead, don't make yourself irreplaceable. Think about the people who'll do emergency maintenance on your application.

* Women are terrible coders. Especially the pretty ones. Always revise their shit.

* Bosses and software "engineers" are mostly useless unless they can write good code. I'm not saying they should: I mean this is how you test them for decency. If you're unsure about your boss, ask him about his past professional life, what projects he worked on, etc. If he's been a programmer in the past, great. If he hasn't, be careful. Watch out for stupid decisions that might impact your work. Always keep that in mind.

* Java development is a pain in the ass, but everything is free. .NET development is not a pain in the ass, but everything costs money.

* Good PHP code is impossible to write. If you think you wrote good PHP code, you're wrong.

* Always keep friendly relationships with the network, server and database guys. They mostly hate developers, and they can and will fuck you over.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 15:23

>>38
You better be trolling. I can't believe someone actually wrote something like that. I don't want to believe it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 15:24

>>38
This doesn't do anything.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 16:07

>>42
That's not true. If critera_met (sic) has been initialised to false or one of its many equivalents, it will display a time-out message.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 16:11

>>41
I wish I was. It gets worse: there were only 3 entries in the table that satisfied the criteria... which is why it was brought to my attention.

>>42
Oh how witty you are, you pedantic spaz. The sad truth is you're almost right: more than 99% of the time it failed to do anything at all. If you got really lucky it would find a suitable row before the HTTP timeout.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 18:18

>>6
HAHAHaruhi posted her (clothed) tits once. That was it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 18:41

>>45
Only if by ``tits" you mean delicious flat chest.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 18:47

Nobody knows functional programming; avoid lambda expressions, lists, filter, map, reduce.
You're supposed to dumb it down so other less competent coders would understand your code?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 19:23

>>47
Indeed, lists are far too complicated for the average Enterprise coder

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 21:12

>>45
Was this on /prog/? Because I can't find it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 21:42

>>36
THIS thread has not gone ANYWHERE.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 22:40

Sagefault (thread bumped).

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 23:13

* Women are terrible coders. Especially the pretty ones. Always revise their shit.
I have one counterexample to this generalization.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-18 23:17

>>45
Progress of this thread depends ON HAHAHaruhi's tits

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 0:07

>>53
That way lies disappointment.
[sup]>>46 is right.[/sub]

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 1:48

The only thing I agree with in this thread is that Xarn should die, like his father.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 8:56

Someone please sagetank this

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 9:14

>>56
It's not even close to being the worst thread on the front page, despite summerfriends like >>55.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 11:49

Always keep friendly relationships with the network, server and database guys. They mostly hate developers, and they can and will fuck you over.

THIS. I am root and I own the routers. Do not fuck with me or I will make your life shit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 12:23

>>56
haha, bump

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 12:34

>>58
Back to your broom closet

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 12:59

>>55
Well, how are we going to do this?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 13:16

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 13:25

>>60
Someone's ldap/svn/git password just got "chage'd" on a random basis.

Oh yeah and your tickets to SysOps, they all get reassigned to the lowest priority. You will never be able to find out why either, shit just happens that no manager will ever know about, ever.

My glass house with raised floor beats your cube code monkey boy.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 13:29

>>63
i have the felling that you are a IHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 13:44

>>58
I swear I have met so many sysop assholes who have some kind of chip on their shoulder about what they're doing such that they adopt precisely this shitty attitude. This is across the board -- in my professional life, obviously, but my own mother, who works at a small high school: her school's "sysop" gives her all sorts of various problems to this day because she once lodged a complaint about the email servers being down for two weeks a few summers ago. TWO WEEKS. So now he breaths down her usage like a hawk. My little old harmless mother. You're all fucking nerds with daddy issues. Get the fuck over yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 13:54

Real life trolling is so much more satisfying than the online variety :)

If I can bring a frown to your day, that just makes me one contented admin.

Somewhere there's a fire, just waiting for lusers like you to die in.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 13:58

>>66
#define you me

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 14:11

>>63
How many boxes of McNuggets will it take to get porn on the production servers?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 14:12

>>67
#define my anus

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 14:12

>>65
The only problem with your story is that you left out the part your mom's email didn't work because she had the wrong email address, mail server settings and client program1 and refused to acknowledge any of it when corrected. She complained every day and refused to cooperate with troubleshooting for TWO WEEKS.

I just made that up, but we all know it's pretty damn accurate and it explains >>58's misanthropy quite well.

1. I don't care how cute the little dog is, you can't connect to email with that Mac FTP client.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 14:25

>>68
Ply me with Weed McNuggets and Beerverages and I will overlook your private stash of pr0ns, and the bandwidth it ate.

Can't have it on the prod boxes though. Just ain't proper. Dev boxes are another matter.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 14:30

I think there are about as many sysadmins who are pissed off because of moronic users as there are who act pissed off in the hopes that nobody will notice they don't actually have a clue what they're doing. I'm pretty sure >>58,63 is an example of the latter.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 14:31

>>72
Keep telling yourself that monkey boy.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 14:32

>>71
On the dev boxes it's just 'data'. (If anyone asks, it's for training the Bayesian filters.)

Name: >>72 2010-07-19 14:35

>>73
I'm actually employed as a sysadmin, not a programmer. An actual sysadmin, that is, not a high school kid who just read that BOFH crap and thinks that's the way the world works.

Name: Randy 2010-07-19 14:37

>>75
Wow. Just wow.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 14:40

>>75
Lies.

Name: VIPPER 2010-07-19 15:28

CYBERJEWS

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 22:30

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-19 22:39

>>79
What the fuck? This is even less than I was expecting which, given the current state of /prog/ was already very little

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List